Git Workflow

Git Workflow Patterns

Best practices for Git version control, branching strategies, and collaborative development.

When to Activate

• Setting up Git workflow for a new project
• Deciding on branching strategy (GitFlow, trunk-based, GitHub flow)
• Writing commit messages and PR descriptions
• Resolving merge conflicts
• Managing releases and version tags
• Onboarding new team members to Git practices

Branching Strategies

GitHub Flow (Simple, Recommended for Most)

Best for continuous deployment and small-to-medium teams.

main (protected, always deployable)
  │
  ├── feature/user-auth      → PR → merge to main
  ├── feature/payment-flow   → PR → merge to main
  └── fix/login-bug          → PR → merge to main

Rules:

• main is always deployable
• Create feature branches from main
• Open Pull Request when ready for review
• After approval and CI passes, merge to main
• Deploy immediately after merge

Trunk-Based Development (High-Velocity Teams)

Best for teams with strong CI/CD and feature flags.

main (trunk)
  │
  ├── short-lived feature (1-2 days max)
  ├── short-lived feature
  └── short-lived feature

Rules:

• Everyone commits to main or very short-lived branches
• Feature flags hide incomplete work
• CI must pass before merge
• Deploy multiple times per day

GitFlow (Complex, Release-Cycle Driven)

Best for scheduled releases and enterprise projects.

main (production releases)
  │
  └── develop (integration branch)
        │
        ├── feature/user-auth
        ├── feature/payment
        │
        ├── release/1.0.0    → merge to main and develop
        │
        └── hotfix/critical  → merge to main and develop

Rules:

• main contains production-ready code only
• develop is the integration branch
• Feature branches from develop, merge back to develop
• Release branches from develop, merge to main and develop
• Hotfix branches from main, merge to both main and develop

When to Use Which

Commit Messages

Conventional Commits Format

<type>(<scope>): <subject>

[optional body]

[optional footer(s)]

Types

Good vs Bad Examples

# BAD: Vague, no context
git commit -m "fixed stuff"
git commit -m "updates"
git commit -m "WIP"

# GOOD: Clear, specific, explains why
git commit -m "fix(api): retry requests on 503 Service Unavailable

The external API occasionally returns 503 errors during peak hours.
Added exponential backoff retry logic with max 3 attempts.

Closes #123"

Commit Message Template

Create .gitmessage in repo root:

# <type>(<scope>): <subject>
# # Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, test, chore, perf, ci, revert
# Scope: api, ui, db, auth, etc.
# Subject: imperative mood, no period, max 50 chars
#
# [optional body] - explain why, not what
# [optional footer] - Breaking changes, closes #issue

Enable with: git config commit.template .gitmessage

Merge vs Rebase

Merge (Preserves History)

# Creates a merge commit
git checkout main
git merge feature/user-auth

# Result:
# *   merge commit
# |\
# | * feature commits
# |/
# * main commits

Use when:

• Merging feature branches into main
• You want to preserve exact history
• Multiple people worked on the branch
• The branch has been pushed and others may have based work on it

Rebase (Linear History)

# Rewrites feature commits onto target branch
git checkout feature/user-auth
git rebase main

# Result:
# * feature commits (rewritten)
# * main commits

Use when:

• Updating your local feature branch with latest main
• You want a linear, clean history
• The branch is local-only (not pushed)
• You're the only one working on the branch

Rebase Workflow

# Update feature branch with latest main (before PR)
git checkout feature/user-auth
git fetch origin
git rebase origin/main

# Fix any conflicts
# Tests should still pass

# Force push (only if you're the only contributor)
git push --force-with-lease origin feature/user-auth

When NOT to Rebase

# NEVER rebase branches that:
- Have been pushed to a shared repository
- Other people have based work on
- Are protected branches (main, develop)
- Are already merged

# Why: Rebase rewrites history, breaking others' work

Pull Request Workflow

PR Title Format

<type>(<scope>): <description>

Examples:
feat(auth): add SSO support for enterprise users
fix(api): resolve race condition in order processing
docs(api): add OpenAPI specification for v2 endpoints

PR Description Template

## What

Brief description of what this PR does.

## Why

Explain the motivation and context.

## How

Key implementation details worth highlighting.

## Testing

- [ ] Unit tests added/updated
- [ ] Integration tests added/updated
- [ ] Manual testing performed

## Screenshots (if applicable)

Before/after screenshots for UI changes.

## Checklist

- [ ] Code follows project style guidelines
- [ ] Self-review completed
- [ ] Comments added for complex logic
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] No new warnings introduced
- [ ] Tests pass locally
- [ ] Related issues linked

Closes #123

Code Review Checklist

For Reviewers:

• [ ] Does the code solve the stated problem?
• [ ] Are there any edge cases not handled?
• [ ] Is the code readable and maintainable?
• [ ] Are there sufficient tests?
• [ ] Are there security concerns?
• [ ] Is the commit history clean (squashed if needed)?

For Authors:

• [ ] Self-review completed before requesting review
• [ ] CI passes (tests, lint, typecheck)
• [ ] PR size is reasonable (<500 lines ideal)
• [ ] Related to a single feature/fix
• [ ] Description clearly explains the change

Conflict Resolution

Identify Conflicts

# Check for conflicts before merge
git checkout main
git merge feature/user-auth --no-commit --no-ff

# If conflicts, Git will show:
# CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/auth/login.ts
# Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.

Resolve Conflicts

# See conflicted files
git status

# View conflict markers in file
# <<<<<<< HEAD
# content from main
# =======
# content from feature branch
# >>>>>>> feature/user-auth

# Option 1: Manual resolution
# Edit file, remove markers, keep correct content

# Option 2: Use merge tool
git mergetool

# Option 3: Accept one side
git checkout --ours src/auth/login.ts    # Keep main version
git checkout --theirs src/auth/login.ts  # Keep feature version

# After resolving, stage and commit
git add src/auth/login.ts
git commit

Conflict Prevention Strategies

# 1. Keep feature branches small and short-lived
# 2. Rebase frequently onto main
git checkout feature/user-auth
git fetch origin
git rebase origin/main