Tdd Workflow
Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with 80%+ coverage including unit, integration, and E2E tests.
- Skill ID
- affaan-m/ecc/tdd-workflow
- Publisher
- affaan-m
- Repository
- ecc
- Installs
- 0
- Files
- 2
- License
- MIT
- Synced
- Sep 23, 2026
Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.
affaan-m/ecc/tdd-workflowInstalls these files- SKILL.md
- agents/openai.yaml
What this skill tells the agent
Test-Driven Development Workflow
This skill ensures all code development follows TDD principles with comprehensive test coverage.
When to Activate
- Writing new features or functionality
- Fixing bugs or issues
- Refactoring existing code
- Adding API endpoints
- Creating new components
Core Principles
1. Tests BEFORE Code
ALWAYS write tests first, then implement code to make tests pass.
2. Coverage Requirements
- Minimum 80% coverage (unit + integration + E2E)
- All edge cases covered
- Error scenarios tested
- Boundary conditions verified
3. Test Types
Unit Tests
- Individual functions and utilities
- Component logic
- Pure functions
- Helpers and utilities
Integration Tests
- API endpoints
- Database operations
- Service interactions
- External API calls
E2E Tests (Playwright)
- Critical user flows
- Complete workflows
- Browser automation
- UI interactions
TDD Workflow Steps
Step 0: Detect the Test Runner
Do not assume npm test. The commands in the steps and examples below use <test>, <test-watch>, and <coverage> as placeholders for the project's actual runner. Resolve them once before starting:
- Run the package-manager detector (ships with ECC):
node scripts/setup-package-manager.js --detectIt resolves the package manager (npm / pnpm / yarn / bun) from, in order: CLAUDE_PACKAGE_MANAGER, .claude/package-manager.json, the package.json packageManager field, the lockfile, then global config.
- Distinguish the package manager from the test runner — they are not the same. A project can use Bun to install dependencies yet still run Jest or Vitest. Inspect
package.jsonscripts.testand the test files:
scripts.testinvokesjest/vitest-> run through the detected PM (npm test,pnpm test,yarn test, orbun run test).scripts.testisbun test, or test filesimport { test, expect } from "bun:test", or there is no jest/vitest config but Bun is present -> use Bun's native runner (bun test). See Bun Native Test Pattern below.
Runner command matrix:
| Runner | <test> | <test-watch> | <coverage> | <lint> |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm | npm test | npm test -- --watch | npm run test:coverage | npm run lint |
| pnpm | pnpm test | pnpm test --watch | pnpm test:coverage | pnpm lint |
| yarn | yarn test | yarn test --watch | yarn test:coverage | yarn lint |
| Bun (script runs jest/vitest) | bun run test | bun run test --watch | bun run test:coverage | bun run lint |
Bun (native bun:test) | bun test | bun test --watch | bun test --coverage | bun run lint |
bun test(Bun's built-in runner) is not the same asbun run test(which runs thepackage.jsontestscript). Picking the wrong one is a common failure — e.g. invoking Jest throughnpx/bun runin an ESM-only project breaks, whilebun testruns the suite natively. Confirm which the project expects before the RED gate, then substitute<test>/<coverage>everywherenpm testappears below.
Step 1: Write User Journeys
As a [role], I want to [action], so that [benefit]
Example:
As a user, I want to search for markets semantically,
so that I can find relevant markets even without exact keywords.Step 2: Generate Test Cases
For each user journey, create comprehensive test cases:
describe('Semantic Search', () => {
it('returns relevant markets for query', async () => {
// Test implementation
})
it('handles empty query gracefully', async () => {
// Test edge case
})
it('falls back to substring search when Redis unavailable', async () => {
// Test fallback behavior
})
it('sorts results by similarity score', async () => {
// Test sorting logic
})
})Step 3: Run Tests (They Should Fail)
<test>
# Tests should fail - we haven't implemented yetStep 4: Implement Code
Write minimal code to make tests pass:
// Implementation guided by tests
export async function searchMarkets(query: string) {
// Implementation here
}Step 5: Run Tests Again
<test>
# Tests should now passStep 6: Refactor
Improve code quality while keeping tests green:
- Remove duplication
- Improve naming
- Optimize performance
- Enhance readability
Step 7: Verify Coverage
<coverage>
# Verify 80%+ coverage achievedTesting Patterns
Unit Test Pattern (Jest/Vitest)
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react'
import { Button } from './Button'
describe('Button Component', () => {
it('renders with correct text', () => {
render(<Button>Click me</Button>)
expect(screen.getByText('Click me')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('calls onClick when clicked', () => {
const handleClick = jest.fn()
render(<Button onClick={handleClick}>Click</Button>)
fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
it('is disabled when disabled prop is true', () => {
render(<Button disabled>Click</Button>)
expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
})
})Bun Native Test Pattern (bun:test)
When the project uses Bun's built-in runner (see Step 0), import from bun:test and run with bun test — not bun run test. The API is Jest-like, so describe / it / expect and most matchers carry over. See the bun-runtime skill for runtime, install, and bundler details.
import { describe, it, expect, mock } from 'bun:test'
import { searchMarkets } from './search'
describe('searchMarkets', () => {
it('returns an empty list for an empty query', async () => {
expect(await searchMarkets('')).toEqual([])
})
it('sorts results by similarity score', async () => {
const results = await searchMarkets('election')
expect(results).toEqual([...results].sort((a, b) => b.score - a.score))
})
})bun test # run once (RED/GREEN gate)
bun test --watch # watch mode during development
bun test --coverage # coverage report- Mock modules with
mock.module(...)/mock(...)frombun:testinstead ofjest.mock(...). - Configure coverage thresholds in
bunfig.tomlunder[test](e.g.coverageThreshold) rather than the JestcoverageThresholdsconfig block.
API Integration Test Pattern
import { NextRequest } from 'next/server'
import { GET } from './route'
describe('GET /api/markets', () => {
it('returns markets successfully', async () => {
const request = new NextRequest('http://localhost/api/markets')
const response = await GET(request)
const data = await response.json()
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
expect(data.success).toBe(true)
expect(Array.isArray(data.data)).toBe(true)
})
it('validates query parameters', async () => {
const request = new NextRequest('http://localhost/api/markets?limit=invalid')
const response = await GET(request)
expect(response.status).toBe(400)
})
it('handles database errors gracefully', async () => {
// Mock database failure
const request = new NextRequest('http://localhost/api/markets')
// Test error handling
})
})E2E Test Pattern (Playwright)
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test'
test('user can search and filter markets', async ({ page }) => {
// Navigate to markets page
await page.goto('/')
await page.click('a[href="/markets"]')
// Verify page loaded
await expect(page.locator('h1')).toContainText('Markets')
// Search for markets
await page.fill('input[placeholder="Search markets"]', 'election')
// Wait for debounce and results
await page.waitForTimeout(600)
// Verify search results displayedMore from affaan-m
Use this skill in a project
Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for affaan-m/ecc/tdd-workflow, and install it in one click.
