Terraform Skill
Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging Terraform/OpenTofu modules, tests, CI, scans, or state ops - diagnoses failure mode (identity churn, secrets, blast radius, CI drift, state corruption) with version-aware guards.
- Skill ID
- antonbabenko/terraform-skill/terraform-skill
- Publisher
- antonbabenko
- Repository
- terraform-skill
- Installs
- 0
- Files
- 9
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Synced
- Sep 23, 2026
Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.
antonbabenko/terraform-skill/terraform-skillInstalls these files- SKILL.md
- references/ci-cd-workflows.md
- references/code-intelligence-lsp.md
- references/code-patterns.md
- references/module-patterns.md
- references/quick-reference.md
- references/security-compliance.md
- references/state-management.md
- references/testing-frameworks.md
What this skill tells the agent
Terraform Skill for Claude
Diagnose-first guidance for Terraform and OpenTofu. Core file is a workflow; depth lives in references loaded on demand.
Response Contract
Every Terraform/OpenTofu response must include:
- Assumptions & version floor — runtime (
terraformortofu), exact version, providers, state backend, execution path (local/CI/Cloud/Atlantis), environment criticality. State assumptions explicitly if the user did not provide them. - Risk category addressed — one or more of: identity churn, secret exposure, blast radius, CI drift, compliance gaps, state corruption, provider upgrade risk, testing blind spots.
- Chosen remediation & tradeoffs — what was chosen, what was traded off, why.
- Validation plan — exact commands (
fmt -check,validate,plan -out, policy check) tailored to runtime and risk tier. - Rollback notes — for any destructive or state-mutating change: how to undo, what evidence to keep.
Never recommend direct production apply without a reviewed plan artifact and approval.
Never run terraform destroy (targeted or full) without first running terraform plan -destroy and showing the user every resource that will be deleted — including implicit dependents pulled in via locals or for_each. Get explicit confirmation before proceeding. Never use -auto-approve on destroy.
Workflow
- Capture execution context — runtime+version, provider(s), backend, execution path, environment criticality.
- Diagnose failure mode(s) using the routing table below. If intent spans categories, load both references.
- Load only the matching reference file(s) — do not preload depth the task does not need.
- Propose fix with risk controls — why this addresses the mode, what could still go wrong, guardrails (tests/approvals/rollback).
- Generate artifacts — HCL, migration blocks (
moved,import), CI changes, policy rules. - Validate before finalizing — run validation commands tailored to risk tier.
- Emit the Response Contract at the end.
Diagnose Before You Generate
| Failure category | Symptoms | Primary references |
|---|---|---|
| Identity churn | Resource addresses shift after refactor, count index churn, missing moved blocks | Code Patterns: count vs for_each, Code Patterns: moved blocks, Code Patterns: LLM mistakes |
| Secret exposure | Secrets in defaults, state, logs, CI artifacts | Security & Compliance, Code Patterns: write-only, State Management |
| Blast radius | Oversized stacks, shared prod/non-prod state, unsafe applies | State Management, Module Patterns |
| Destroy cascade | Targeted destroy deletes more than expected; locals referencing a targeted resource make all for_each consumers implicit dependents | Response Contract: plan-destroy first; State Management: Safe Destroy |
| CI drift | Local plan ≠ CI plan, apply without reviewed artifact, unpinned versions | CI/CD Workflows, Code Patterns: versions |
| Compliance gaps | Missing policy stage, no approval model, no evidence retention | Security & Compliance, CI/CD Workflows |
| Testing blind spots | Plan-only validation of computed values, set-type indexing, mock/real confusion | Testing Frameworks |
| State corruption / recovery | Stuck lock, backend migration, drift reconciliation | State Management |
| Provider upgrade risk | Breaking-change provider bump, unpinned modules | Code Patterns: versions, Module Patterns |
| Provider lifecycle | Removing a provider with resources still in state, orphaned resources, removed block usage | State Management: Provider Removal |
| Bootstrap / orchestration misuse | null_resource + local-exec for bootstrap, remote-exec for setup scripts, provisioner stdout leaking secrets in CI logs | Code Patterns: Provisioners as Last Resort |
| Navigation / safe-rename blind spots | Cannot locate symbol defs/refs semantically, value-symbol rename done as blind text replace, grep-only refactor missing refs, hallucinated rg shim | Code Intelligence |
| Cross-cloud / provider mapping | "What's the Azure/GCP equivalent of X", picking a backend/auth model per cloud | State Management: Cross-cloud equivalents |
When to Use This Skill
Activate when: creating or reviewing Terraform/OpenTofu configurations or modules, setting up or debugging tests, structuring multi-environment deployments, implementing IaC CI/CD, choosing module patterns or state organization, configuring or migrating remote state backends.
Don't use for: basic HCL syntax questions Claude already knows, provider API reference (link to docs), cloud-platform questions unrelated to Terraform/OpenTofu.
Core Principles
Module Hierarchy
| Type | When to Use | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Resource module | Single logical group of connected resources | VPC + subnets, SG + rules |
| Infrastructure module | Collection of resource modules for a purpose | Multiple resource modules in one region/account |
| Composition | Complete infrastructure | Spans multiple regions/accounts |
Flow: resource → resource module → infrastructure module → composition.
Directory Layout
environments/ # prod/ staging/ dev/ — per-env configurations
modules/ # networking/ compute/ data/ — reusable modules
examples/ # minimal/ complete/ — docs + integration fixturesSeparate environments from modules. Use examples/ as both documentation and test fixtures. Keep modules small and single-responsibility.
See Module Patterns for architecture principles, naming conventions, variable/output contracts.
Naming Conventions (summary)
- Descriptive resource names (
aws_instance.web_server, notaws_instance.main) - Reserve
thisfor genuine singleton resources only - Prefix variables with context (
vpc_cidr_block, notcidr) - Standard files:
main.tf,variables.tf,outputs.tf,versions.tf
See Module Patterns: Variable Naming and Code Patterns: Block Ordering for examples.
Block Ordering (summary)
Resource blocks: count/for_each first → arguments → tags → depends_on → lifecycle. Variable blocks: description → type → default → validation → nullable → sensitive.
See Code Patterns: Block Ordering & Structure for the full rules and examples.
Testing Strategy
Decision Matrix: Which Testing Approach?
| Situation | Approach | Tools | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick syntax check | Static analysis | validate, fmt | Free |
| Pre-commit validation | Static + lint | validate, tflint, trivy, checkov | Free |
| Terraform 1.6+, simple logic | Native test framework | terraform test | Free-Low |
Use this skill in a project
Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for antonbabenko/terraform-skill/terraform-skill, and install it in one click.
