Dx Code Analyzer Run
Run Salesforce Code Analyzer to scan code for security, performance, best practice, and code style violations. Supports all engines (PMD, ESLint, CPD, RetireJS, Flow, SFGE, ApexGuru), targets (files, folders, git diff), categories, and severities. Also handles post-scan exploration: filtering results by engine/severity/category/file, and explaining what rules mean. TRIGGER when: user says 'scan my code', 'check security issues', 'run PMD/ESLint', 'find duplicates', 'analyze Flows', 'check vulnerable libraries', 'AppExchange review', 'lint my LWC', 'static analysis', 'code quality', 'show security violations', 'what is this rule', 'explain ApexCRUDViolation', 'filter results', or mentions engines/file types (.cls, .trigger, .js, .flow-meta.xml). Use this skill for scanning, exploring results, and listing rules. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user asks only about installation/configuration (use dx-code-analyzer-configure), or wants to create a custom rule (use dx-code-analyzer-custom-rule-create).
- Skill ID
- forcedotcom/sf-skills/dx-code-analyzer-run
- Publisher
- forcedotcom
- Repository
- sf-skills
- Installs
- 0
- Files
- 24
- Synced
- Sep 23, 2026
Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.
forcedotcom/sf-skills/dx-code-analyzer-runInstalls these files- SKILL.md
- examples/README.md
- examples/basic-scan-output.json
- examples/command-variations.md
- examples/fix-application-before-after.md
- examples/large-scan-output.json
- examples/security-focused-output.json
- references/command-examples.md
- references/engine-reference.md
- references/error-handling.md
- references/flag-reference.md
- references/post-scan-workflows.md
- references/quick-start.md
- references/special-behaviors.md
- references/vendor-file-handling.md
- scripts/apply-fixes.js
- scripts/describe-rule.js
- scripts/discover-fixes.js
- scripts/filter-violations.js
- scripts/list-rules.js
- scripts/parse-results.js
- scripts/query-results.js
- scripts/summarize-fixes.js
- scripts/verify-execution.sh
What this skill tells the agent
Running Code Analyzer Skill
CRITICAL: Mandatory Script Usage
Every interaction with Code Analyzer results MUST go through the bundled scripts in <skill_dir>/scripts/. No exceptions.
WRONG — never do this:
# WRONG: inline Python to parse results
python3 -c "import json; data = json.load(open('results.json'))..."
# WRONG: inline Node.js to parse results
node -e "const data = require('./results.json')..."
# WRONG: jq to filter results
cat results.json | jq '.violations[] | select(.engine=="pmd")'
# WRONG: reading the results file directly (it can be 10MB+)
Read tool → code-analyzer-results-*.jsonAlso forbidden: run_code_analyzer and any mcp__* tool — Bash only.
RIGHT — always do this:
# Summarize scan results
node "<skill_dir>/scripts/parse-results.js" "./code-analyzer-results-TIMESTAMP.json"
# Filter/rank/query results (by engine, severity, file, rule, category)
node "<skill_dir>/scripts/query-results.js" "./code-analyzer-results-TIMESTAMP.json" --engine pmd --summary
# List/browse available rules (by engine, category, language, severity)
node "<skill_dir>/scripts/list-rules.js" "Security" --top 10
# Look up what a rule means
node "<skill_dir>/scripts/describe-rule.js" "ApexCRUDViolation" --engine pmd
# Discover fixable violations
node "<skill_dir>/scripts/discover-fixes.js" "./code-analyzer-results-TIMESTAMP.json"
# Apply fixes (after user confirms)
node "<skill_dir>/scripts/apply-fixes.js" "./code-analyzer-results-TIMESTAMP.json"
# Summarize applied fixes
node "<skill_dir>/scripts/summarize-fixes.js" "./code-analyzer-results-TIMESTAMP.json"
# Filter vendor files (jQuery, Bootstrap, *.min.js) before applying fixes
node "<skill_dir>/scripts/filter-violations.js" "./code-analyzer-results-TIMESTAMP.json" "./code-analyzer-results-TIMESTAMP-filtered.json" --report<skill_dir> is the absolute path to the directory containing this SKILL.md. Never use ./scripts/ — that resolves against the user's CWD, not the skill dir.
Any aggregation, filter, or rank question ("which file has the most violations?", "how many PMD issues?", "top rules by count", "break down by severity") is answered by query-results.js — its output already includes topRules, topFiles, and severityCounts.
Overview
Ecosystem: This skill is part of a 3-skill Code Analyzer suite —dx-code-analyzer-run(scans & results) ·dx-code-analyzer-configure(setup, config, CI/CD) ·dx-code-analyzer-custom-rule-create(custom rule authoring).
This skill translates natural-language requests ("scan for security issues", "check my changes") into the correct sf code-analyzer run command, executes scans across any combination of engines/targets/severities, and presents actionable results. When engine-provided fixes are available, it discovers them, asks for user confirmation, applies them safely, and offers verification. Use it for static analysis, security reviews, AppExchange certification, code-quality checks, and finding duplicates/vulnerabilities in Salesforce projects.
In scope: running scans, parsing/filtering/ranking results, applying engine auto-fixes, diff-based scans, all output formats (JSON/HTML/SARIF/CSV/XML), describing/listing rules, scan-failure troubleshooting.
Out of scope: installing/configuring sf or the plugin (→ dx-code-analyzer-configure), writing custom rules/engines (→ dx-code-analyzer-custom-rule-create), AI-generated fixes beyond engine-provided ones, deep refactoring, CI/CD setup (→ dx-code-analyzer-configure).
Allowed tools: Bash (sf code-analyzer, node, git diff, date), Read, Write, Edit. Forbidden: any MCP tool, Agent tool, web tools, other skills, Python, jq, inline scripts/heredocs. This skill owns the complete scan-fix-verify-query-explain workflow end-to-end.
Command Syntax Rules (READ FIRST — ABSOLUTE)
- The command is `sf code-analyzer run` — NOT
sf scanner run(deprecated v3). - No `--format` flag. Use
--output-file <path>.<ext>; the extension determines the format. - Always pass
--output-filewith a timestamped name (e.g.,./code-analyzer-results-20260512-143022.json) — do not rely on stdout. - Foreground only (no
run_in_background); timeout 1200000ms for large scans. - Invalid v3 flags that cause errors:
--format,--engine,--category,--json. Use--rule-selector+--output-fileinstead. - Tool restriction: Bash, Read, Write, Edit only. No MCP tools, no Agent tool, no web tools, no other skills.
Why: the v4+ CLI redesigned the flag interface; v3 flags now error.
Full flag/selector docs: <skill_dir>/references/flag-reference.md.
Prerequisites
User needs: Salesforce CLI (sf), @salesforce/plugin-code-analyzer (v5.x+), Java 11+ (PMD/CPD/SFGE), Node.js 18+ (ESLint/RetireJS), Python 3 (Flow), authenticated org (ApexGuru).
Pre-flight: run sf code-analyzer --help 2>&1 | head -1. If that fails, or if a scan reports an engine startup error (e.g., "PMD failed to start", "java: command not found", "SFGE failed"):
- Stop — do not attempt to install/diagnose prerequisites yourself.
- Delegate to `dx-code-analyzer-configure` — it handles all setup.
- After it finishes, return here and re-run the scan.
If a scan fails for other reasons, see <skill_dir>/references/error-handling.md.
Quick Start: Common Patterns
Match the request below; if it matches, jump to Step 3 (Build Command). Otherwise, walk Step 1.
| User Says | Rule Selector | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| "scan my code" / "run code analyzer" | Recommended | Curated set, all file types |
| "check for security issues" / "security review" | all:Security:(1,2) | All engines, Critical+High |
| "scan my changes" / "check the diff" | (see Step 1.5) | Get files via git diff, filter to scannable types, pass via --target |
| "run PMD" / "check my Apex" | pmd | Apex classes and triggers |
| "lint my LWC" / "check my JavaScript" | eslint | JavaScript/TypeScript/LWC |
| "find duplicates" / "check for copy-paste" | cpd | Code clones |
| "check for vulnerabilities" / "scan libraries" | retire-js | JavaScript library CVEs |
| "deep analysis" / "data flow analysis" | sfge | Java 11+, 10–20 min, use --workspace "force-app" |
| "performance analysis" / "governor limits" | apexguru | Authenticated org required |
| "analyze my Flows" | flow | --target **/*.flow-meta.xml, Python 3 |
| "AppExchange security review" | all:Security:(1,2) | See <skill_dir>/references/special-behaviors.md → AppExchange |
Step 1: Parse the User's Intent
Analyze the request along these 7 dimensions; any can combine.
1.1 ENGINE
PMD/Apex → pmd · ESLint/JS/TS/lint → eslint · Flows → flow · duplicates/CPD → cpd · vulnerabilities/CVE/RetireJS → retire-js · SFGE/data flow → sfge · performance/ApexGuru → apexguru · regex → regex · everything → all · unspecified → Recommended.
1.2 CATEGORY
security/OWASP → Security · performance → Performance · best practices → BestPractices · style/format → CodeStyle · design/complexity → Design · bugs → ErrorProne · docs → Documentation.
1.3 SEVERITY
1=Critical · 2=High · 3=Moderate · 4=Low · 5=Info. "critical only" → 1 · "critical+high" → (1,2) · "moderate and above" → (1,2,3).
1.4 SPECIFIC RULE
If the user names a rule (e.g., "ApexCRUDViolation", "no-unused-vars"): --rule-selector <engine>:<ruleName>, or just <ruleName> if engine is ambiguous.
Partial names: --rule-selector requires the exact full rule name (e.g., @salesforce-ux/slds/no-hardcoded-values-slds2, not no-hardcoded-values). No wildcards. If you are not 100% certain, look it up first — do not guess:
sf code-analyzer rules --rule-selector all 2>&1 | grep -i "USER_KEYWORD"Multiple matches → ask the user which. Zero matches → tell the user nothing matched.
More from forcedotcom
Use this skill in a project
Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for forcedotcom/sf-skills/dx-code-analyzer-run, and install it in one click.
