forcedotcom/sf-skills3 files

Experience Lwc Rtl Validate

Use this skill to review a Lightning Web Component (.html, .js, .css files) for right-to-left (RTL) internationalization correctness, producing a finding list with code-level fixes covering CSS logical properties, bidirectional text handling, keyboard semantics, and RTL-aware SLDS class usage. TRIGGER when the user says \"review this LWC for RTL\", \"audit i18n compliance\", \"fix bidirectional text rendering\", \"replace left/right CSS with logical properties\", \"check RTL layout issues\", \"verify SLDS RTL classes\", \"review my component for Arabic/Hebrew layout\", \"ensure this LWC works in RTL locales\", or \"check bidi text handling\". DO NOT TRIGGER when the user is building a new LWC (use experience-lwc-generate), refactoring SLDS classes themselves (use design-systems-slds-apply or design-systems-slds2-migrate), or performing accessibility/security review.

Specification
Skill ID
forcedotcom/sf-skills/experience-lwc-rtl-validate
Publisher
forcedotcom
Repository
sf-skills
Installs
0
Files
3
Synced
Sep 23, 2026
How to use it

Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.

forcedotcom/sf-skills/experience-lwc-rtl-validateInstalls these files
  • SKILL.md
  • references/rtl-expert.md
  • scripts/scan-rtl-css.sh

What this skill tells the agent

<!-- adk-managed-skill -->

Reviewing LWC RTL

Run a structured right-to-left (RTL) internationalization compliance pass over a Lightning Web Component, producing a report of issues found and code-level fixes to bring the component into compliance with Salesforce RTL guidelines.

When to Use

  • The user asks for an "RTL review", "i18n check", "RTL compliance pass", or "RTL audit" on a specific LWC.
  • Preparing a component for release in RTL locales (Arabic, Hebrew, Farsi, Urdu).
  • Investigating layout defects reported in RTL environments.
  • Verifying SLDS class usage after a CSS refactor.

Do NOT use this skill for:

  • Building new components (use experience-lwc-generate).
  • Modifying SLDS classes themselves (use design-systems-slds-apply or design-systems-slds2-migrate).
  • Accessibility or security review — run those as separate passes with the relevant tooling.
  • Gating a fix behind a feature flag (apply feature-flag gating after fixes land).

Prerequisites

  • Component path (LWC bundle under modules/…).
  • Access to the component's HTML templates, JS/TS, and CSS.

Knowledge Base

The reference is the source of truth. Do not summarize from memory — open the reference, apply the guidelines, and cite the specific section you used in the report.

  • RTL internationalization: RTL Expert

Workflow

Step 1 — Scope the review

Collect the component path and identify the files to review: .html, .js/.ts, .css, and any child components owned by the same team that are invoked from the target.

Note any existing feature-flag gates (e.g., Aura.org.rtlPhase1FixEnabled) — findings that require code changes must respect them.

Step 2 — Read the knowledge base

Read RTL Expert top-to-bottom before judging. It enumerates the physical-to-logical property mappings, bidirectional text handling patterns, and — critically — the SLDS constraints that override generic RTL advice.

Step 3 — CSS inspection

Run the deterministic scanner over every .css file in the bundle. The scanner matches CSS declarations only — never SLDS class names in HTML `class="…"` attributes (see Step 5). Inline style="…" attributes must be scanned separately (either by extracting them into a temp file or by inspecting the HTML by hand and applying the same rules).

"<skill_dir>/scripts/scan-rtl-css.sh" <cssFile1> [<cssFile2> ...]

Each output line has the shape <file>:<line>: <property>: <value> -> <logical-property>: <logical-value>. The scanner tokenizes declarations (splits on ; inside {…}) so minified multi-declaration lines produce one finding per physical declaration and selector names are never rewritten. Translate each line into a Step 6 bullet (<file>:<line> — <pattern> → <logical property> plus a one-sentence Fix). Empty output IS a valid result — record it as "No issues found." in the report.

Scanner-recognised patterns (kept in sync with the script's regex — do not add rules here without also updating scan-rtl-css.sh):

  • left / right → inset-inline-start / inset-inline-end
  • margin-left / margin-right → margin-inline-start / margin-inline-end
  • padding-left / padding-right → padding-inline-start / padding-inline-end
  • text-align: left / right → text-align: start / end
  • border-left-* / border-right-* → border-inline-start-* / border-inline-end-*
  • float: left / float: right → float: inline-start / float: inline-end (or remove and use flex/grid)
  • transform: translateX(...) — flagged; sign-flip or use a logical alternative

border-radius with explicit corners is not scanned automatically — inspect corner shorthand by hand and translate to the logical corner variants.

Step 4 — HTML / JS inspection

Walk templates and JS for:

  • Icon flipping hints — flag only icons with directional semantics that appear in plain HTML `<img>` / inline SVG / raw Unicode / background-image CSS. Do NOT flag `<lightning-icon>` in LWC templates (including directional utility names like utility:chevronright, utility:chevronleft, utility:back, utility:forward); lightning-icon renders through the Lightning icon service, which mirrors directional utility icons automatically in RTL locales. Treat it the same way you treat SLDS utility classes.
  • dir attribute usage — confirm it's sourced from locale, not hardcoded.
  • Keyboard arrow-key semantics — Left/Right arrow handlers should swap in RTL where navigation is directional (tab bars, sliders, tree expand/collapse).
  • Directional Unicode controls — ensure user-generated text is not stripped of RLM/LRM markers when rendered.
  • Inline style="…" with physical properties — same rules as Step 3.

Step 5 — SLDS constraints

SLDS class handling is the highest-priority RTL rule. When a rule below says "do NOT flag", that class must not appear as a finding in the report — not as an issue, not as a "fix", not as a rename suggestion.

  1. SLDS utility classes with `_left` / `_right` suffixes are RTL-aware and MUST NOT be flagged. They already mirror automatically in RTL under the hood — this includes slds-text-align_right, slds-text-align_left, slds-m-left_*, slds-m-right_*, slds-p-left_*, slds-p-right_*, slds-float_left, slds-float_right, slds-border_left, slds-border_right, and the rest of the _left / _right utility family. Leave them exactly as written.
  2. `_start` / `_end` variants of SLDS classes DO NOT EXIST. Never rename slds-*_right → slds-*_end or slds-*_left → slds-*_start. There is no such class; the rename would break the stylesheet. If you are tempted to "fix" an SLDS utility class by adding _start/_end, STOP — the correct action is to leave the class alone (see rule 1).
  3. *Never modify, rename, or remove any `slds-` class.** SLDS ships RTL-aware stylesheets; altering classes breaks the contract.
  4. If custom CSS duplicates what an SLDS class already handles, the fix is removal — not conversion. Delete the redundant custom rule; leave the SLDS class alone. Do NOT convert the removed property to its logical equivalent, and do NOT offer removal + conversion as two alternatives; there is one fix, and it is deletion. Example: float: right in a .css file next to class="slds-button__icon_right" in the template — delete the entire .custom-icon { float: right } rule. Do not "also suggest float: inline-end" — that would be wrong; the SLDS class already handles placement.
  5. If an SLDS class has an RTL gap, add complementary custom CSS rather than altering the SLDS class.

Concrete negative example — a template with <span class="slds-text-align_right slds-m-right_small">…</span> alongside a custom padding-left: 4px in the component's CSS: the ONLY finding is the CSS padding-left (Step 3). The two slds-*_right classes are not findings and must not appear in the report.

Step 6 — Produce the report

Write <outputDir>/rtl-review.md in this exact shape (blank line after each ## heading; every summary sentence ends with a period):

## RTL

- <file>:<line> — <physical pattern> → <logical property / SLDS class>
  Fix: <one-sentence explanation>; applied: yes/no
- <file>:<line> — <physical pattern> → <logical property / SLDS class>
  Fix: <one-sentence explanation>; applied: yes/no

## Summary

- <n> issues found; <m> fixed; <k> deferred (with reason).
- <one-sentence overview of what was found and why the remaining items are correct or deferred>.
- Cite: RTL Expert — <section title>.

Populate the ## RTL bullets from the scan-rtl-css.sh output for CSS findings, and append hand-authored bullets in the same shape for the Step 4 HTML/JS findings. When there are no findings, emit the single bullet - No issues found. under ## RTL and a Summary that reports 0 issues found; 0 fixed; 0 deferred. plus a one-sentence overview and citation.

More from forcedotcom

Use this skill in a project

Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for forcedotcom/sf-skills/experience-lwc-rtl-validate, and install it in one click.

Use this skill