- Skill ID
- gamedev-skills/awesome-gamedev-agent-skills/ai-behavior-trees-utility-ai
- Publisher
- gamedev-skills
- Repository
- awesome-gamedev-agent-skills
- Installs
- 238
- Files
- 5
- Synced
- Oct 23, 2026
Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.
gamedev-skills/awesome-gamedev-agent-skills/ai-behavior-trees-utility-aiInstalls these files- SKILL.md
- references/behavior-tree-core.md
- references/best-practices-and-pitfalls.md
- references/practical-examples.md
- references/utility-ai-system.md
What this skill tells the agent
Behavior Trees & Utility AI
Two complementary ways to structure NPC decision-making, plus how to combine them. A behavior tree (BT) expresses structured, prioritized, reactive logic as a tree that is "ticked" each step. Utility AI answers "how much do I want each option right now?" by scoring actions with normalized curves and picking the best. Ship believable agents by using a BT for structure and Utility AI where graded trade-offs matter.
This skill is the implementation companion to game-ai (which helps you choose between FSM / BT / steering / pathfinding). Read game-ai to pick a model; read this to build the runtime.
When to use
- Use to build a reusable BT runtime: a
Blackboard,Nodebase, action/condition leaves,Sequence/Selector/Parallelcomposites, and decorators (Inverter, Cooldown, Repeat). - Use to build a Utility AI decider: response curves, considerations, and an evaluator that scores and selects actions (max, softmax, or weighted-random for variety).
- Use to build hybrid AI — a BT whose leaf delegates the "which attack / which target" choice to a utility evaluator.
*When not to use: to choose between FSM, BT, steering, or pathfinding, and for A/navmesh routing, use game-ai. For Unreal's asset-based BehaviorTree/Blackboard, BTTask/BTService and AIController, use unreal-behavior-trees. For the navmesh agent that moves the NPC, use unity-navmesh or the engine's navigation node.
Core workflow
- Pick the model. Structured, prioritized, interruptible behavior → BT. Continuous "score every option" decisions (targeting, needs, item choice) → Utility. Both → hybrid.
- Design the Blackboard first. One typed key/value store per agent is the shared memory that decouples nodes; leaves read/write it and never hold references to each other.
- Write leaves. Conditions return
Success/Failureimmediately; actions returnRunningacross frames until they finish. Keep leaves small and side-effect-explicit. - Compose.
Selector= OR/fallback (first non-failure wins);Sequence= AND (stop at first non-success);Parallelfor concurrent branches. Wrap with decorators for policy (invert, cooldown, repeat, force-success). - For Utility: enumerate considerations, map each raw fact through a normalized 0..1 curve, combine (weighted product with compensation, or weighted sum), then select the max — add hysteresis so agents don't flip-flop on ties.
- Tick deliberately. Tick the tree/evaluator once per decision step (often slower than render). Preserve
Runningstate between ticks; verify by drawing the active path and the per-action scores on screen while tuning.
Architecture at a glance
A behavior tree evaluates top-down, left-to-right; each node returns a status up to its parent:
flowchart TD
Root["Selector (root)"] --> Combat["Sequence: Combat"]
Root --> Patrol["Action: Patrol"]
Combat --> See["Condition: CanSeePlayer?"]
Combat --> InRange{"Selector: Reach"}
Combat --> Attack["Action: Attack (Running)"]
InRange --> Close["Condition: InAttackRange?"]
InRange --> MoveTo["Action: MoveToPlayer (Running)"]Utility AI is a scoring pipeline — every candidate action is scored, then one is selected:
facts (distance, health, ammo…)
│ each fact → a normalized 0..1 response curve (consideration)
▼
score(action) = weight · combine(consideration_1 … consideration_n) # product+compensation or sum
▼
select: argmax · or softmax / weighted-random for variety · + hysteresis to avoid jitterStatus is a three-value enum shared by every node — this is the contract that makes the tree composable:
public enum Status { Success, Failure, Running }
public abstract class Node
{
public abstract Status Tick(Blackboard bb, float dt);
public virtual void Reset() { } // called when a parent abandons this subtree
}// Selector = fallback/OR: return the first child that is not Failure.
public sealed class Selector : Composite
{
public override Status Tick(Blackboard bb, float dt)
{
for (; _current < Children.Count; _current++)
{
var s = Children[_current].Tick(bb, dt);
if (s != Status.Failure) return s; // Success or Running stops the scan
}
_current = 0;
return Status.Failure; // every child failed
}
}The reciprocal Sequence (AND — stop at first non-Success), Parallel, the Blackboard, the leaf base classes, and every decorator are in references/behavior-tree-core.md.
Utility scoring in one snippet
// A consideration maps one raw fact to 0..1 through a response curve.
float Score(Blackboard bb)
{
float distance01 = Curves.InverseLerp01(bb.Get<float>("distToPlayer"), 20f, 2f); // near = 1
float health01 = Curves.Sigmoid(bb.Get<float>("health01"), k: 8f, mid: 0.4f); // hurt = low
// Product + compensation keeps a single 0 from vetoing while low values still dampen.
return Curves.CompensatedProduct(new[] { distance01, health01 });
}The full curve library (linear, quadratic, exponential, logistic/sigmoid, smoothstep), the Consideration/UtilityAction types, and the UtilityEvaluator selection strategies are in references/utility-ai-system.md.
Pitfalls
- Re-ticking a `Running` action from the root every frame restarts it. Return
Runningand resume where you left off; onlyReset()a subtree when a parent actually abandons it. - Deep trees re-evaluated wholesale each tick waste time and cause thrash. Prefer shallow trees and conditional aborts (a higher-priority condition can interrupt a lower branch).
- Un-normalized considerations. If one curve outputs 0..100 and another 0..1, the big one dominates. Every consideration must return 0..1.
- Utility jitter on near-ties. Add hysteresis: give the currently-running action a small bonus so the agent commits instead of oscillating.
- Allocating nodes, closures, or arrays every tick creates GC spikes. Build the tree once at spawn; keep per-tick work allocation-free.
References
references/behavior-tree-core.md— Blackboard,Node/leaf base classes, action & condition leaves,Sequence/Selector/Parallel, and the decorator library (full C#).references/utility-ai-system.md— response-curve library,Consideration,UtilityAction, and theUtilityEvaluator(argmax, softmax, weighted-random, hysteresis).references/practical-examples.md— a guard Patrol→Combat BT, a villager needs-based Utility AI, and a hybrid agent, as drop-in templates.references/best-practices-and-pitfalls.md— memory management, profiling, avoiding deep trees, event-driven aborts, and combining Utility AI with BTs (hybrid architecture).
Related skills
game-ai— choose between FSM / BT / steering; A* and navmesh pathfinding.unreal-behavior-trees— Unreal's asset-based BT/Blackboard, tasks, decorators, services.unity-navmesh— theNavMeshAgentthat carries out "move to" intents.physics-tuning— agent radius, movement, and collision response for the motion layer.tower-defense,fps-shooter,rpg— genres that compose this decision layer.
More from gamedev-skills
Use this skill in a project
Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for gamedev-skills/awesome-gamedev-agent-skills/ai-behavior-trees-utility-ai, and install it in one click.
