- Skill ID
- grafana/skills/prometheus-cardinality-troubleshooter
- Publisher
- grafana
- Repository
- skills
- Installs
- 0
- Files
- 1
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Synced
- Sep 23, 2026
Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.
grafana/skills/prometheus-cardinality-troubleshooterInstalls these files- SKILL.md
What this skill tells the agent
Prometheus Cardinality Troubleshooter
You are an expert in diagnosing live Prometheus cardinality problems. When a user reports a Prometheus performance, memory, or cost issue that smells like cardinality, use this guide to triage systematically.
This skill is diagnostic and operational. For schema design and prevention, route to prometheus-label-strategy.
Before You Remediate: The One Rule
Under pressure, the tempting move is to labeldrop the high-cardinality label at scrape time. Do not. You cannot remove, at scrape time, any label that makes a series unique — not pod, not instance, not anything that distinguishes one real series from another. It looks like it stops the bleeding; it actually breaks the data:
- Counter resets from different series get merged →
rate()andincrease()return garbage, often absurdly high values. - Multiple samples land on the same series per scrape → duplicate-sample / out-of-order errors and inflated DPM, not reduced.
- The breakage is silent (no config error) and leaves no evidence in the data of where it went wrong. Weeks later someone asks "why is my DPM so high / why is
rate()absurd?" and there's nothing to point to.
The only safe remediations are:
- *Drop an entire unwanted metric* (
action: dropon__name__) — you're discarding the whole metric, not merging distinct series. - Fix the source — stop the application emitting the bad label (the real fix for unbounded
path,user_id, etc.). - Adaptive Metrics — for structural cardinality on series you can't fix at the source. It aggregates correctly (counter-reset-aware, audited, reversible). This is the right way to reduce the cost of a label like
pod. Route toadaptive-metrics.
Everywhere below that says "drop a label," read it through this rule: drop whole metrics, fix the source, or use Adaptive Metrics — never labeldrop a distinguishing label.
Symptom → Likely Cause
| Symptom | Likely Cause | First Action |
|---|---|---|
| Prometheus OOMKilled or memory growing linearly | Active series growth (often from a new bad metric or label) | Active Series triage |
| Single PromQL query slow or OOMs the querier | One or more metrics in the query have high cardinality | Per-query drill-down |
| Remote write lagging, WAL growing | Sample throughput spike — series count OR scrape interval changed | Active Series triage + check scrape intervals |
429 Too Many Samples / out of bounds errors | Hitting Mimir/Cortex ingester per-tenant series limit | Per-metric drill-down, find the new offender |
| Grafana Cloud Active Series bill spiked | New metric, new label, or rollout creating churn | Per-metric drill-down + churn check |
| Grafana Cloud DPM bill spiked but Active Series flat | Scrape interval shortened, OR remote_write sending duplicates | DPM-side issue — route to dpm-finder |
series_limit_per_user errors after a deploy | Application change introduced a new bad label | Recent change diff |
| Series count grows then resets every restart | Series churn from ephemeral label values | Churn diagnosis |
Step 1: Active Series Triage
Get the headline number
# Total active series in the local Prometheus
prometheus_tsdb_head_series
# Or for Mimir / Grafana Cloud Metrics (per tenant)
cortex_ingester_memory_series{user="<tenant>"}Compare to recent history:
# Growth over the last 7 days
deriv(prometheus_tsdb_head_series[7d]) * 86400A growth rate > a few % per day on a stable application set is a red flag.
Use the TSDB status endpoint
Prometheus exposes a built-in cardinality breakdown:
curl -s http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/status/tsdb | jqReturns:
seriesCountByMetricName— top metrics by series countlabelValueCountByLabelName— top labels by unique value countmemoryInBytesByLabelName— top labels by memory footprintseriesCountByLabelValuePair— top label-value pairs by series count
This is usually the fastest path to "which metric / which label is the problem."
For Grafana Cloud:
# Same endpoint, authenticated against the per-tenant Mimir
curl -s -u "<user>:<token>" \
"https://prometheus-prod-XX.grafana.net/api/prom/api/v1/status/tsdb" | jqStep 2: Read the Output
Top metrics by series count
"seriesCountByMetricName": [
{ "name": "http_request_duration_seconds_bucket", "value": 184320 },
{ "name": "go_gc_duration_seconds", "value": 80 },
...
]Heuristics:
- A histogram (
_bucket) at the top is almost always the answer — those have a 14× multiplier (bucket count + 3). The fix is usually reducing the labels on the underlying histogram at the source (in instrumentation code), not stripping them at scrape and not touching the buckets themselves. - A metric in the top 5 you don't recognize → grep the codebase for it; it's likely a new feature flag or a debug metric that shipped to prod
- The same metric showing up under multiple variants (
_total,_count,_sum) — that's a histogram or summary, count all variants together for the true impact
Top labels by unique value count
"labelValueCountByLabelName": [
{ "name": "url", "value": 84210 },
{ "name": "trace_id", "value": 41000 },
{ "name": "pod", "value": 1820 }
]Red flags:
- Any label with >10K unique values is almost certainly a bug. The only exceptions are intentional per-target labels in massive fleets.
trace_id,request_id,session_id,query,email,path,url— these should never be labels. They belong in exemplars, logs, or traces.podwith thousands of values — see Churn diagnosis; recent churn often inflates this number
Step 3: Per-Metric Drill-Down
Once you've identified a suspect metric, find which label is responsible.
Count distinct label values per label, for one metric
# How many unique values does each label have on this metric?
count by (__name__) (
count by (__name__, label_name_here) (
http_request_duration_seconds_bucket
)
)Repeat per label, or use the helper:
# Via the Prometheus HTTP API
curl -s "http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/labels?match[]=http_request_duration_seconds_bucket" | jq -r '.data[]' | \
while read label; do
count=$(curl -s "http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/label/${label}/values?match[]=http_request_duration_seconds_bucket" | jq '.data | length')
echo "${count} ${label}"
done | sort -rn | head -20Find the top label values for one label
# Top 20 path values for http_requests_total
topk(20,
count by (path) (http_requests_total)
)If you see UUIDs, hashes, timestamps, or numeric IDs in the top values → that label has unbounded values from the source.
Per-metric series count, grouped
# Series-per-instance breakdown — if uneven, one instance is misbehaving
sum by (job, instance) ({__name__=~"my_metric.*"})Step 4: Recent Change Diff
If the cardinality fire started recently, the cause is almost always a recent change. Diff what's there now against what was there before.
List of metrics, current vs. yesterday
Via Grafana Cloud cardinality dashboard, or:
# Current metrics
group by (__name__) ({__name__!=""})
# Compare to last week (offset)
group by (__name__) ({__name__!=""} offset 7d)Diff externally. A new metric near the top of seriesCountByMetricName that wasn't there a week ago → that's your offender.
Correlate with deploys
# Active series correlated with build_info
prometheus_tsdb_head_series
# Overlay with:
changes(app_build_info[1d])More from grafana
Use this skill in a project
Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for grafana/skills/prometheus-cardinality-troubleshooter, and install it in one click.
