jeffli1993/seo-audit-skill7 files

SEO Audit

>-

Specification
Skill ID
jeffli1993/seo-audit-skill/seo-audit
Publisher
jeffli1993
Repository
seo-audit-skill
Installs
0
Files
7
Synced
Sep 23, 2026
How to use it

Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.

jeffli1993/seo-audit-skill/seo-auditInstalls these files
  • SKILL.md
  • assets/report-template.html
  • references/REFERENCE.md
  • scripts/check-page.py
  • scripts/check-schema.py
  • scripts/check-site.py
  • scripts/fetch-page.py

What this skill tells the agent

seo-audit — Basic SEO Audit

A lightweight SEO agent skill designed for quick, default single-page SEO audits. Powered by OpenClaw. Suitable for first-time page checks or when a rapid assessment is needed without full technical depth.


When to Use This Skill

Use seo-audit when:

  • The user says: "audit this page", "check SEO", "analyze my URL", "quick SEO check", "what's wrong with my page"
  • No specific depth is requested — this is the default entry point
  • The user needs a fast, readable summary rather than a comprehensive technical breakdown

If the user wants more depth, upgrade to seo-audit-full:

Tip: For deep technical audits, advanced on-page SEO, or full reports, use the seo-audit-full skill.

Input Expected

InputRequiredNotes
Page URLYesThe page to audit
Raw HTML or page contentOptionalEnables more accurate on-page analysis
GSC / analytics dataOptionalNot required for basic audit

If only a URL is provided and no source code or crawler data is available, clearly state:

Limitation: This audit is based on visible page content and publicly available signals only. Source code, GSC data, crawl logs, and performance metrics are not available for this audit.

Output

Produce a Basic SEO Audit Report by filling the template at assets/report-template.html, then save it to a file — never print raw HTML to the terminal.

File naming: reports/<hostname>-<slug>-audit.html

https://example.com/blog/best-tools → reports/example-com-blog-best-tools-audit.html
https://example.com/                → reports/example-com-audit.html

After saving, tell the user:

✅ Report saved → reports/example-com-audit.html
   Open it now? (yes / no)

If yes → run: open reports/example-com-audit.html


Template placeholders — fill each independently:

PlaceholderContent
{{summary_verdict}}One sentence: total checks run, how many failed/warned/passed
{{summary_critical_html}}<li> per critical (fail) item, or <li class="summary-empty">None</li>
{{summary_warnings_html}}<li> per warning item, or <li class="summary-empty">None</li>
{{summary_passing_html}}<li> per passing check, or <li class="summary-empty">None</li>

Scripts

Run these scripts before writing any findings. They output structured JSON — use the JSON directly as evidence; do not re-fetch the same URLs manually.

Dependencies: pip install requests (html parsing uses Python stdlib)

# Step 1: site-level checks (robots.txt + sitemap.xml)
python scripts/check-site.py https://example.com

# Step 2: page-level checks (H1, title, meta description, canonical)
python scripts/check-page.py https://example.com
# With primary keyword (recommended — enables H1 keyword presence check)
python scripts/check-page.py https://example.com --keyword "running shoes"

# Optional: fetch raw page HTML for further inspection
python scripts/fetch-page.py https://example.com --output page.html

# Step 3: JSON-LD schema validation
python scripts/check-schema.py https://example.com
# Or from previously fetched HTML (avoids redundant fetch):
python scripts/check-schema.py --file page.html

Each script exits with code 0 (all pass/warn) or 1 (any fail/error).

STRICT SCOPE — do not add any check not listed below. No exceptions.

Allowed site-level checks (in {{site_checks_html}}):

  • robots.txt · sitemap.xml · 404 Handling · URL Canonicalization · i18n / hreflang

Allowed E-E-A-T checks (in {{eeat_checks_html}}):

  • About Us · Contact · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Media/Partners (only if present)

Contact logic (Contact row only):

  • A dedicated /contact page is not required
  • Pass if contact is reachable via any of: dedicated contact page (HTTP 200) · About page with contact details · footer/nav mailto, email, social links, or contact form
  • Fail only when no contact pathway exists anywhere on the site
  • Missing /contact alone is not a fail when About or footer/nav already expose contact info

Allowed page-level checks (in {{page_checks_html}}), output in this exact order: URL Slug · Title Tag · Meta Description · H1 Tag · Canonical Tag · Image Alt Text · Word Count · Keyword Placement · Heading Structure · Internal Links · Schema (JSON-LD)

Image Alt Text logic:

  • Parse <img> tags from static HTML
  • Pass: all images have non-empty alt (decorative images with alt="" are OK)
  • Warn: any content image missing alt attribute
  • Unverified (status-info): 0 images found in static HTML → likely JS-rendered, cannot verify

⛔ HARD RULE — Output ONLY the check rows defined in report-template.html. If a check is not in the allowed lists above, do NOT output it — not even if you find issues. No exceptions. No "bonus" checks. No improvisation. The template is the single source of truth. Treat it as a strict whitelist.

Still BANNED (belong to seo-audit-full): OG tags · Twitter Card · Social tags · Page Weight · Core Web Vitals · Robots Meta

How to use the JSON output:

  • Map each field's status → pass / warn / fail / error directly to the report check table
  • Use each field's detail string as the starting point for the Evidence line in findings
  • Do not contradict the script output unless you have additional observable evidence
  • Separate check groups with <div class="subsection-label">Label</div> inside {{site_checks_html}}: Crawlability · URL Canonicalization · i18n / hreflang · Schema (JSON-LD) and <div class="subsection-label">E-E-A-T Trust Pages</div> before {{eeat_checks_html}}

LLM review — mandatory when `llm_review_required: true`:

The script flags fields that require semantic or quality judgment it cannot perform. Never leave llm_review_required: true unresolved — always make an explicit judgment call.

H1 — triggered when `keyword_match == "partial"`:

h1_text : (from h1.values[0])
keyword : (the --keyword passed to the script)

Judge: Does this H1 semantically cover the keyword's search intent?
  - Consider synonyms, natural variants, topic coverage
  - yes → downgrade to "pass", note the variant
  - no  → keep "warn" or upgrade to "fail", explain the gap

Title — triggered when `keyword_match == "partial"` OR `keyword_position != "start"`:

title   : (from title.value)
keyword : (the --keyword passed)

Judge:
  1. Does the title semantically cover the keyword's search intent?
  2. Is the title grammatically correct and naturally readable?
  3. Keyword position — apply different standards by page type:
     - Homepage   : Brand + core keyword is correct (e.g. "Acme | AI Workflow Automation")
                    Do NOT flag brand-first as a problem.
     - Inner pages: Core keyword should lead (e.g. "AI Workflow Automation for Teams — Acme")
                    Flag if keyword is buried mid-title without good reason.

IMPORTANT — do NOT flag these as negatives:
  - Years (e.g. "2026") → signal freshness, increase CTR — treat as positive unless
    the page is explicitly evergreen content where dating would hurt longevity.
  - Numbers (e.g. "5 best", "Top 10", "3 steps") → set clear expectations,
    consistently outperform non-numeric titles in CTR — always treat as a plus.
  - Specific qualifiers ("Open-Source", "Self-Hosted", "Free") → narrow intent
    and attract higher-quality clicks — do not penalize.

URL Slug — triggered when `keyword_match != "full"` or `is_homepage == false`:

slug    : (from url_slug.slug)
keyword : (the --keyword passed)

Judge:
  1. Does the slug contain the primary keyword or a natural variant?
  2. Is the path hierarchy logical? (/category/keyword is ideal)
  3. Is it concise and human-readable?
  Homepage (is_homepage: true): skip — no judgment needed.

Meta Description — always triggered when content is present:

Use this skill in a project

Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for jeffli1993/seo-audit-skill/seo-audit, and install it in one click.

Use this skill