- Skill ID
- juliusbrussee/cavekit/spec
- Publisher
- juliusbrussee
- Repository
- cavekit
- Installs
- 0
- Files
- 1
- Synced
- Sep 23, 2026
Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.
juliusbrussee/cavekit/specInstalls these files- SKILL.md
What this skill tells the agent
spec — spec mutator
Read FORMAT.md at repo root if not already loaded. Caveman skill applies to all writes here.
DISPATCH
Inspect user request and project state:
- No
SPEC.mdat repo root AND args describe idea → NEW - No
SPEC.mdANDfrom-codein args → DISTILL SPEC.mdexists AND args startbug:→ BACKPROPSPEC.mdexists AND args startamend→ AMENDSPEC.mdexists, no args → ask user which mode
INPUTS — spec is the sole mutator
The other verbs produce material; spec writes it. Ingest their handoff blocks into the right section, show a diff, write on OK:
- grill → sharpened §G + §C
- research → §R rows (add the §R section if absent)
- review → drafted §V lines + the risk verdict
- deepen → §I/§V/§T amendments
⊥ rewrite a section the handoff did not name. Sectioned ownership (see FORMAT.md).
NEW — idea → spec
Input: user idea. If it arrived fuzzy, prefer running grill first.
Steps:
- Extract goal (1 line, caveman). → §G.
- List constraints user stated or implied. → §C.
- List external surfaces user named. → §I.
- §R only if research ran — else omit the section (right-size).
- Propose initial invariants. → §V (numbered V1…).
- Break goal into ordered tasks. → §T pipe table, all status
., ids T1… - §B section with header row only (
id|date|cause|fix).
Write to SPEC.md. Show user full file. Ask: "spec OK? /review if high-blast-radius, else /build."
DISTILL — code → spec
Walk repo. Produce §G (infer from README/package.json/main entry), §C (infer from stack), §I (enumerate public APIs/CLIs/configs), §V (derive from tests and assertions), §T (one task per known TODO or missing test), §B (empty).
Caveman everywhere. Flag uncertain items with ? in text so user can confirm.
BACKPROP — bug → §B + §V
Input: bug: <description>.
Steps:
- Parse bug description.
- Find root cause (read relevant code).
- Decide: would a new invariant catch recurrence? If yes → draft
V<next>. - Append §B row:
B<next>|<date>|<cause>|V<N>. - Append new invariant to §V.
- If fix also changes behavior → add/update §T rows.
- Show diff. Apply only on user OK.
Rule: every bug gets a §B entry. Invariant optional but preferred.
AMEND — targeted edit
Input: amend §V.3 or amend §T etc.
Read that section. Show current. Ask user what changes. Write. Show diff.
Never silently rewrite sections user did not name.
OUTPUT RULES
- Caveman format per
FORMAT.md. - Preserve identifiers, paths, code verbatim.
- Numbering monotonic — never reuse §V.N or §B.N.
- §T row
citescolumn ! list §V/§I deps:T5|.|impl auth mw|V2,I.api.
NON-GOALS
- No sub-agents. Main thread writes.
- No dashboards, no logs, no state files beyond SPEC.md itself.
- No auto-build after spec. User invokes build explicitly.
More from juliusbrussee
Use this skill in a project
Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for juliusbrussee/cavekit/spec, and install it in one click.
