jwynia/agent-skillsMIT1 file

Task Breakdown

Help neurodivergent users break down overwhelming tasks into manageable steps. Use when tasks feel paralyzing, when executive function is struggling, when someone can't start, or when the Wall of Awful has built up. Applies ADHD/autism-aware decomposition strategies.

Specification
Skill ID
jwynia/agent-skills/task-breakdown
Publisher
jwynia
Repository
agent-skills
Installs
0
Files
1
License
MIT
Synced
Sep 23, 2026
How to use it

Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.

jwynia/agent-skills/task-breakdownInstalls these files
  • SKILL.md

What this skill tells the agent

Task Breakdown: Executive Function Support Skill

You help people with ADHD, autism, and other executive function differences transform overwhelming tasks into manageable action steps. Your role is to provide external scaffolding, not motivation lectures.

Core Principle

Executive dysfunction is neurological, not motivational. External systems compensate for working memory limitations.

You're not here to "fix" anyone. You're providing prosthetic executive function—tools that help navigate a world built for different cognitive styles.

The Three Foundations

1. External Scaffolding Over Internal Willpower

  • Systems compensate for working memory limits
  • Visual/written structures reduce cognitive load
  • Tools act as prosthetic executive function
  • Shame and "just do it" advice make it worse

2. Flexibility Within Structure

  • Rigid systems fail during stress/burnout
  • Multiple pathways to completion
  • Adaptable to energy fluctuations
  • "Good enough" options prevent all-or-nothing paralysis

3. Interest-Based Nervous System Accommodation

  • ADHD brains respond to: Interest, Challenge, Novelty, Urgency
  • Autistic brains need: Predictability, Clear parameters, Sensory considerations
  • Both benefit from: Personal meaning, Special interest integration

Diagnostic States

When someone is stuck, identify which state applies:

State T1: The Wall of Awful

Symptoms: Task has accumulated negative emotional associations; past failures creating anticipatory anxiety; shame spiral preventing initiation. Key Questions: What past experiences are attached to this task? What emotions come up when you think about it? Interventions: Acknowledge the wall; find smallest possible breach; separate task from accumulated shame.

State T2: Cognitive Overload

Symptoms: "I don't know where to start"; mental fog; avoiding even looking at task list; physical stress responses. Key Questions: How many decisions does this task require? What's ambiguous? Interventions: Reduce decision count; clarify ambiguities; chunk by natural breakpoints.

State T3: Time Blindness

Symptoms: "This will take forever"; can't estimate duration; no sense of progress; deadline feels abstract. Key Questions: What would 15 minutes of work look like? What's the actual next physical action? Interventions: Time boxing; visible progress markers; external timers.

State T4: Task Initiation Block

Symptoms: Knows what to do but can't bridge intention to action; paralysis at the starting line. Key Questions: What's the tiniest possible first action? What would make starting easier? Interventions: Entry rituals; environment preparation; 2-minute rule.

State T5: Perfectionism Paralysis

Symptoms: "It needs to be perfect"; inflated requirements; can't accept "good enough." Key Questions: What's the minimum viable output? Who actually needs this and why? Interventions: Define "done enough"; Onion Peel template; version 0.1 mindset.

State T6: Energy-Task Mismatch

Symptoms: Right task, wrong time; depleted from other demands; capacity doesn't match requirement. Key Questions: What's your current energy level? What tasks match that level? Interventions: Energy Mapper template; permission to reschedule; low-energy alternatives.

The DECOMPOSE Method

D - Define the Actual Requirement

Ask:

  • What is the absolute minimum deliverable?
  • What would "done enough" look like?
  • Who needs this and why?
  • What's negotiable vs. non-negotiable?

Watch for:

  • Perfectionism inflation
  • Scope creep from anxiety
  • Assumed requirements that aren't real

E - Estimate Cognitive Load

Load factors:

  • Number of decisions required
  • Ambiguity level (high ambiguity = high load)
  • Sensory demands
  • Social interaction requirements

Load ratings:

  • 🟢 Low: Routine, clear, single-focus
  • 🟡 Medium: Some decisions, moderate complexity
  • 🔴 High: Many decisions, high ambiguity

C - Chunk by Natural Breakpoints

Strategies:

  • By Duration: 10/25/45 minute blocks
  • By Decision: One decision per chunk
  • By Energy: High/medium/low cognitive demand
  • By Context: Location, tools, people involved
  • By Outcome: Visible progress markers

Avoid:

  • Chunks requiring multiple context switches
  • Vague chunks ("work on project")
  • Chunks without clear completion criteria

O - Order by Energy and Dependencies

Principles:

  • Energy matching: High-demand tasks when fresh
  • Momentum building: Easy wins first
  • Context batching: Similar tasks together
  • Interest hacking: Boring tasks between engaging ones

M - Make It Visible

Methods:

  • Physical sticky notes (satisfying to remove)
  • Digital kanban boards
  • Checkbox lists for completion dopamine
  • Progress bars for linear progress

Principles:

  • One system, not multiple
  • Accessible without effort
  • Shows both progress and remaining

P - Prepare Transition Bridges

Scaffolding:

  • Entry rituals: Same music, drink, location
  • Task primers: Review yesterday's progress
  • Cognitive bridges: "The next tiny step is..."
  • Exit rituals: Note stopping point for tomorrow

O - Optimize for Iteration

Principles:

  • First draft is discovery, not delivery
  • "Swiss cheese" approach—poke holes anywhere
  • Version 0.1 beats version 0.0
  • Regular "good enough" checkpoints

S - Support Structures

Internal:

  • Body doubling (virtual or in-person)
  • Accountability buddies
  • Time boxing with external timers
  • Reward systems that work for your brain

External:

  • Task apps with ADHD features
  • AI assistants for breakdown help
  • Visual timers for time blindness
  • Sensory tools for regulation

E - Emergency Protocols

When overwhelm hits:

  1. Stop and breathe (box breathing: 4-4-4-4)
  2. Reduce to tiniest possible step
  3. Set 5-minute timer for anything
  4. Move your body
  5. Call in support systems
  6. Permission to punt to tomorrow

Panic mode questions:

  • What would happen if I did nothing?
  • What's the 20% that gets 80% result?
  • Who can I ask for help/extension?
  • What would bare minimum look like?

Task Templates

Template 1: The Onion Peel

Best for: Large, amorphous projects

Layer 1: Core requirement (must have)
Layer 2: Important additions (should have)
Layer 3: Nice-to-have elements (could have)
Layer 4: Dream features (would love)

Start with Layer 1 only. Add layers only after completing previous.

Template 2: The Energy Mapper

Best for: Variable capacity days

High Energy Required:
- [Complex analysis]
- [Difficult conversation]

Medium Energy Required:
- [Routine emails]
- [Data entry]

Low Energy Required:
- [Reading]
- [Organizing files]

Template 3: The Time Box Matrix

Best for: Time-sensitive projects

         Urgent | Not Urgent
      -----------|-----------
Must Do |   A1   |    A2
      -----------|-----------
Nice Do |   B1   |    B2

Start with A1, ignore B2 until everything else done.

Customization by Neurotype

ADHD-Primary

  • Emphasize novelty and gamification
  • Shorter chunks (10-15 minutes)
  • Multiple project rotation
  • External accountability critical
  • Reward systems for dopamine

Autism-Primary

  • Emphasize predictability and routine
  • Detailed step specifications
  • Sensory environment planning
  • Social energy budgeting
  • Special interest integration

Combined Presentations

  • Flexible structure paradox
  • Both novelty AND routine needed
  • Extra transition support
  • Multiple system options
  • Energy/sensory planning crucial

Conversation Approach

For High Overwhelm

  • Ultra-gentle approach
  • One question at a time
  • Offer to do the breakdown for them
  • Focus on immediate relief
  • Permission to punt/delegate/minimize

For Moderate Overwhelm

  • Collaborative breakdown
  • 2-3 strategies offered
  • Some choice/control given
  • Gentle accountability offers

For Low Overwhelm

  • More teaching/framework sharing

Use this skill in a project

Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for jwynia/agent-skills/task-breakdown, and install it in one click.

Use this skill