- Skill ID
- mastra-ai/mastra/e2e-tests-studio
- Publisher
- mastra-ai
- Repository
- mastra
- Installs
- 0
- Files
- 1
- Synced
- Sep 23, 2026
Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.
mastra-ai/mastra/e2e-tests-studioInstalls these files- SKILL.md
What this skill tells the agent
E2E Behavior Validation for Frontend Modifications
Core Principle: Test Product Behavior, Not UI States
CRITICAL: Tests must verify that product features WORK correctly, not just that UI elements render.
What NOT to test (UI States):
- ❌ "Dropdown opens when clicked"
- ❌ "Modal appears after button click"
- ❌ "Loading spinner shows during request"
- ❌ "Form fields are visible"
- ❌ "Sidebar collapses"
What TO test (Product Behavior):
- ✅ "Selecting an LLM provider configures the agent to use that provider"
- ✅ "Creating a new agent persists it and shows in the agents list"
- ✅ "Running a tool with parameters returns the expected output"
- ✅ "Chat messages stream correctly and maintain conversation context"
- ✅ "Workflow execution triggers tools in the correct order"
BDD Structure (REQUIRED)
Every E2E spec MUST follow the same BDD shape as the MSW tests. In packages/playground, e2e-bdd/test-needs-when-describe enforces this shape.
The structure has exactly three levels:
- Outer `test.describe` = the unit under test (one page or feature per file).
- Inner `test.describe('when …')` = exactly ONE precondition. The title MUST start with
when. - Each `test` = exactly ONE observable outcome.
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';
import { resetStorage } from '../__utils__/reset-storage';
test.describe('Tools list page', () => {
// the unit
test.afterEach(async () => {
await resetStorage();
});
test.describe('when a registered tool is clicked', () => {
// ONE precondition (starts with "when")
test('navigates to that tool detail page', async ({ page }) => {
// ONE outcome
await page.goto('/tools');
await page.locator('text=Get current weather for a location').click();
await expect(page).toHaveURL(/\/tools\/weatherInfo$/);
});
test('shows the tool name as the page heading', async ({ page }) => {
// ONE outcome
await page.goto('/tools');
await page.locator('text=Get current weather for a location').click();
await expect(page.locator('h2')).toHaveText('weatherInfo');
});
});
});Rules:
- One outer
test.describeper file naming the unit. - Every leaf
testlives inside atest.describe('when …')precondition group. No top-level flat `test()`. - Split a multi-assertion
test()only where assertions represent distinct outcomes; keep tightly-coupled assertions that prove a single outcome together. Never drop an assertion. - Place
beforeEach/afterEachin the narrowestdescribescope that needs them.
Prerequisites
Requires Playwright MCP server. If the browser_navigate tool is unavailable, instruct the user to add it:
claude mcp add playwright -- npx @playwright/mcp@latestStep 1: Understand the Feature Intent
Before writing ANY test, answer these questions:
- What user problem does this feature solve?
- What is the expected outcome when the feature works correctly?
- What data flows through the system? (user input → API → state → UI)
- What should persist after page reload?
- What downstream effects should this action have?
Document these answers as comments in your test file.
Step 2: Build and Start
pnpm build:cli
cd packages/playground/e2e/kitchen-sink && pnpm devVerify server at http://localhost:4111
Step 3: Map Feature to Behavior Tests
Feature-to-Test Mapping Guide
| Feature Category | What to Test | Example Assertion |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Configuration | Config changes affect agent behavior | Send message → verify response uses selected model |
| LLM Provider Selection | Selected provider is used in requests | Intercept API call → verify provider in request payload |
| Tool Execution | Tool runs with correct params & returns result | Execute tool → verify output matches expected transformation |
| Workflow Execution | Steps execute in order, data flows between steps | Run workflow → verify each step's output feeds next step |
| Chat/Streaming | Messages persist, context maintained across turns | Multi-turn conversation → verify context awareness |
| MCP Server Tools | Server tools are callable and return data | Call MCP tool → verify response structure and content |
| Memory/Persistence | Data survives page reload | Create item → reload → verify item exists |
| Error Handling | Errors surface correctly to user | Trigger error condition → verify error message + recovery |
Step 4: Write Behavior-Focused Tests
Test Structure Template
import { test, expect, Page } from '@playwright/test';
import { resetStorage } from '../__utils__/reset-storage';
import { selectFixture } from '../__utils__/select-fixture';
import { nanoid } from 'nanoid';
/**
* FEATURE: [Name of feature]
* USER STORY: As a user, I want to [action] so that [outcome]
* BEHAVIOR UNDER TEST: [Specific behavior being validated]
*/
test.describe('[Feature Name] - Behavior Tests', () => {
let page: Page;
test.beforeEach(async ({ browser }) => {
const context = await browser.newContext();
page = await context.newPage();
});
test.afterEach(async () => {
await resetStorage(page);
});
test.describe('when [the single precondition for these outcomes]', () => {
test('[verb describing the single observable outcome]', async () => {
// ARRANGE: Set up preconditions
// - Navigate to the feature
// - Configure any required state
// ACT: Perform the user action that triggers the behavior
// ASSERT: Verify the OUTCOME, not the UI state
// - Check data persistence
// - Verify downstream effects
// - Confirm API calls made correctly
});
});
});Behavior Test Patterns
Pattern 1: Configuration Affects Behavior
test.describe('when a different LLM provider is selected', () => {
test('uses that provider for agent responses', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await page.goto('/agents/my-agent/chat');
// Intercept API to verify provider
let capturedProvider: string | null = null;
await page.route('**/api/chat', route => {
const body = JSON.parse(route.request().postData() || '{}');
capturedProvider = body.provider;
route.continue();
});
// ACT: Select a different provider
await page.getByTestId('provider-selector').click();
await page.getByRole('option', { name: 'OpenAI' }).click();
// Send a message to trigger the agent
await page.getByTestId('chat-input').fill('Hello');
await page.getByTestId('send-button').click();
// ASSERT: Verify the selected provider was used
await expect.poll(() => capturedProvider).toBe('openai');
});
});Pattern 2: Data Persistence
test.describe('when a new agent is created', () => {
test('persists after page reload', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await page.goto('/agents');
const agentName = `Test Agent ${nanoid()}`;
// ACT: Create new agent
await page.getByTestId('create-agent-button').click();
await page.getByTestId('agent-name-input').fill(agentName);
await page.getByTestId('save-agent-button').click();
// Wait for creation to complete
await expect(page.getByText(agentName)).toBeVisible();
// ASSERT: Verify persistence
await page.reload();
await expect(page.getByText(agentName)).toBeVisible({ timeout: 10000 });
});
});Pattern 3: Tool Execution Produces Correct Output
More from mastra-ai
Use this skill in a project
Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for mastra-ai/mastra/e2e-tests-studio, and install it in one click.
