mims-harvard/tooluniverse7 files

Tooluniverse Literature Deep Research

Deep literature review — PubMed, EuropePMC, bioRxiv preprints, citation networks, evidence synthesis. Disambiguates queries, runs collision-aware searches, grades evidence T1-T4, and produces structured reports. Use for systematic literature review, meta-analysis evidence collection, and detailed answer-with-citations workflows.

Specification
Skill ID
mims-harvard/tooluniverse/tooluniverse-literature-deep-research
Publisher
mims-harvard
Repository
tooluniverse
Installs
0
Files
7
Synced
Sep 23, 2026
How to use it

Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.

mims-harvard/tooluniverse/tooluniverse-literature-deep-researchInstalls these files
  • EXAMPLES.md
  • FULLTEXT_STRATEGY.md
  • QUICK_REFERENCE.md
  • REPORT_TEMPLATE.md
  • SKILL.md
  • TOOL_NAMES_REFERENCE.md
  • WORKFLOW.md

What this skill tells the agent

Literature Deep Research

Systematic literature research: disambiguate, search with collision-aware queries, grade evidence, produce structured reports.

KEY PRINCIPLES: (1) Disambiguate first (2) Right-size deliverable (3) Grade every claim T1-T4 (4) All sections mandatory even if "limited evidence" (5) Source attribution for every claim (6) English-first queries, respond in user's language (7) Report = deliverable, not search log


LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS

Search PubMed/EuropePMC FIRST before reasoning. A published paper beats memory.

Factoid search strategy:

  1. Extract KEY TERMS (most specific nouns/verbs)
  2. EuropePMC_search_articles(query="term1 term2 term3", limit=5)
  3. No results -> BROADEN (remove most restrictive term)
  4. Too many -> NARROW (add specific terms)
  5. Answer usually in abstract of top results
  6. Failed query -> try DIFFERENT TERMS/synonyms, don't repeat

COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE

When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.

Workflow

Phase 0: Clarify + Mode Select → Phase 1: Disambiguate + Profile → Phase 2: Literature Search → Phase 3: Report

Phase 0: Mode Selection

ModeWhenDeliverable
FactoidSingle concrete question1-page fact-check report + bibliography
Mini-reviewNarrow topic1-3 page narrative
Full Deep-ResearchComprehensive overview15-section report + bibliography

Factoid Mode (Fast Path)

# [TOPIC]: Fact-check Report
## Question / ## Answer (with evidence rating) / ## Source(s) / ## Verification Notes / ## Limitations

Domain Detection

PatternDomainAction
Gene/protein symbolBiological targetFull bio disambiguation
Drug nameDrugDrug disambiguation (1.5)
Disease nameDiseaseDisease disambiguation (1.6)
CS/ML topicGeneral academicSkip bio tools, literature-only
Cross-domainInterdisciplinaryResolve each entity in its domain

Cross-Skill Delegation

  • Gene/protein deep-dive: tooluniverse-target-research
  • Drug profile: tooluniverse-drug-research
  • Disease profile: tooluniverse-disease-research

Use this skill for literature synthesis. Use specialized skills for entity profiling. For max depth, run both.


Phase 1: Subject Disambiguation + Profile

1.1 Biological Target Resolution

UniProt_search → UniProt_get_entry_by_accession → UniProt_id_mapping
ensembl_lookup_gene → MyGene_get_gene_annotation

1.2 Naming Collision Detection

Check first 20 results. If >20% off-topic, build negative filter: NOT [collision1] NOT [collision2]. Gene family: "ADAR" NOT "ADAR2" NOT "ADARB1". Cross-domain: add context terms.

1.3 Baseline Profile (Bio Targets)

InterPro_get_protein_domains, UniProt_get_ptm_processing_by_accession, HPA_get_subcellular_location,
GTEx_get_median_gene_expression, GO_get_annotations_for_gene, Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways,
STRING_get_protein_interactions, intact_get_interactions, OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblID

GPCR targets: delegate to tooluniverse-target-research.

1.5 Drug Disambiguation

Identity: OpenTargets_get_drug_chembId_by_generic_name, ChEMBL_get_drug, PubChem_get_CID_by_compound_name, drugbank_get_drug_basic_info_by_drug_name_or_id Targets: ChEMBL_get_drug_mechanisms, OpenTargets_get_associated_targets_by_drug_chemblId, DGIdb_get_drug_gene_interactions Safety: OpenTargets_get_drug_adverse_events_by_chemblId, OpenTargets_get_drug_indications_by_chemblId, search_clinical_trials

1.6 Disease Disambiguation

OpenTargets disease search → EFO/MONDO IDs
DisGeNET_get_disease_genes, DisGeNET_search_disease
CTD_get_disease_chemicals

1.7 Compound Queries (e.g., "metformin in breast cancer")

Resolve both entities, then cross-reference via CTD_get_chemical_gene_interactions, CTD_get_chemical_diseases, OpenTargets drug-target/drug-disease tools. Intersect shared targets/pathways.

1.8 General Academic / 1.9 Interdisciplinary

Non-bio: skip bio tools, use ArXiv/DBLP/OSF. Cross-domain: resolve bio entities with 1.1-1.3, search CS/general in parallel, merge and cross-reference.


Phase 2: Literature Search

Methodology stays internal. Report shows findings, not process.

2.1 Query Strategy

Step 1: Seeds (15-30 core papers): domain-specific title searches with date/sort filters. Step 2: Citation expansion: PubMed_get_cited_by, EuropePMC_get_citations/references, PubMed_get_related, SemanticScholar_get_recommendations, OpenCitations_get_citations. If the opt-in Noodle MCP is connected (noodle_*, needs NOODLE_MCP_URL), its bounded citation/semantic graph traversal is another angle on the same PubMed corpus -- a discovery signal, not evidence of causality or validity, same caveat as the others. Step 3: Collision-filtered broader queries: "[TERM]" AND ([context]) NOT [collision]

2.2 Literature Tools — core set + adaptive by domain

Run the core multi-field set on every review (catches what any single index misses), then add the domain rows that match the subject. Don't fire every source blindly — 6–10 well-chosen indexes beat 20 noisy ones.

ALWAYS run (core, all disciplines): PubMed_search_articles, EuropePMC_search_articles, openalex_search_works (query param search/query) or openalex_literature_search (query param search_keywords) — pick one and match its param; mixing them silently returns off-topic results — and SemanticScholar_search_papers

Then add by domain:

DomainAdd theseNotes
Biomedical / clinicalPMC_search_papers (full text), PubTator3_LiteratureSearch (entity & relations: queries), PubMed_Guidelines_Search (clinical guidelines)PubTator normalizes gene/drug/disease entities
Biology (ecology/evolution/plant)EuropePMC as PRIMARY + OpenAlexPubMed returns 0–1 for non-clinical biology
CS / ML / AIArXiv_search_papers, DBLP_search_publicationsarXiv + CS bibliography
Physics / HEP / astroInspireHEP_search_papers1.6M+ particle/astro records
Broad / hard-to-find / OACrossref_search_works, CORE_search_papers, DOAJ_search_articles, Fatcat_search_scholar, Consensus_search_papersDOI registry + OA aggregators + Internet Archive Scholar; Consensus (220M+ papers) adds an AI takeaway + study-design metadata per paper -- useful for fast triage, not a substitute for reading the source
Regional / EU-fundedOpenAIRE_search_publications, HAL_search_archiveEU open science + French national archive
Datasets / software / outputsFigshare_search_articles, Zenodo_search_recordsCitable DOIs for data & code
Preprints (latest)EuropePMC_search_articles(source='PPR'), OSF_search_preprints, BioRxiv_get_preprint/MedRxiv_get_preprint (DOI lookup)bioRxiv/medRxiv/PsyArXiv etc.

Multi-source: advanced_literature_search_agent (12+ DBs; needs Azure key -- fallback: query the core set individually). Citation impact: iCite_search_publications (RCR/APT), iCite_get_publications (by PMID), scite_get_tallies (support/contradict). PubMed-only; for CS use SemanticScholar.

A domain-specific index returning 0 (e.g. ArXiv on a pure-clinical topic) is normal — only worry if the whole core set is empty.

2.3-2.4 Full-Text & PubMed Zero-Result Fallback

Full-text: see FULLTEXT_STRATEGY.md for three-tier strategy.

CRITICAL: PubMed returns 0 for ~30% of valid queries. Always retry with EuropePMC when PubMed returns empty. This is not optional.

2.5 Tool Failure / OA Handling

Use this skill in a project

Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for mims-harvard/tooluniverse/tooluniverse-literature-deep-research, and install it in one click.

Use this skill