- Skill ID
- petrkindlmann/qa-skills/api-testing
- Publisher
- petrkindlmann
- Repository
- qa-skills
- Installs
- 0
- Files
- 4
- License
- MIT
- Synced
- Sep 23, 2026
Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.
petrkindlmann/qa-skills/api-testingInstalls these files- SKILL.md
- references/playwright-setup.md
- references/schema-validation.md
- references/test-patterns.md
What this skill tells the agent
<objective> A response that adds a nullable field or quietly drops one slips past toHaveProperty spot-checks and silently breaks the frontend in production. Schema-as-contract tests catch that drift in CI, not prod. This skill produces REST and GraphQL API tests that assert response shape, status codes, headers, auth boundaries, and timing — against a real test environment, not a mocked stand-in. </objective>
Discovery Questions
Check .agents/qa-project-context.md first — if it exists, use it and skip anything already answered there. Then:
- REST, GraphQL, or both? REST-only suites use standard HTTP assertions. GraphQL needs query/mutation builders and benefits from an introspection-diff snapshot.
- Auth mechanism? JWT, API key, OAuth 2.0, or session cookies — each needs a different fixture strategy.
- OpenAPI/Swagger spec available? If yes, auto-generate Zod schemas as contracts (
orval,openapi-zod-client) and consider spec-driven fuzzing with Schemathesis.
Core Principles
- Test contracts, not implementations. Assert on response shape, status codes, and headers — not on internal logic or database state.
- Schema validation catches drift before it breaks consumers. A failing schema test means you caught a breaking change before your frontend did.
- Auth flows are tests too — don't just hardcode tokens. Test login, refresh, expiration, and permission boundaries.
- Response time is a testable assertion. Performance regressions caught in CI are cheaper than production incidents.
Exploratory vs Automated: Tooling
API exploration (debugging, manual probing, OpenAPI playground) and automated API testing are different jobs. Use the right tool for each:
| Tool | Best for | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Bruno (v3.4+) | File-based collections, git-reviewable workflows, FOSS Postman replacement | Filesystem-first, no cloud sync required; gRPC + OAuth + GraphQL query builder |
| Hurl (8.x) | Plain-text HTTP testing, CI smoke checks | One file = many requests + assertions; runs anywhere curl runs; certificate + JSONPath (RFC 9535) queries |
| Hoppscotch | Web-based Postman-style exploration | Open source, runs in browser, good for quick checks |
| Playwright `APIRequestContext` | Automated tests in your test runner | This skill's focus — covered below |
| Supertest (Node) / httpx (Python) | In-process API tests against your own app | Fastest feedback when you control both sides |
Skip Postman/Insomnia for new projects unless your team already has investment there — file-based tools (Bruno, Hurl) are easier to review in PRs and survive when collections drift.
Playwright API Testing
APIRequestContext supports standalone API tests without launching a browser and shares cookie/storage state with browser contexts. Use it for:
- Standalone API tests —
request.get/post/...with status, header, and body assertions. - Combined browser + API tests — seed data via API, assert it appears in the UI, then clean up via API.
- Authenticated fixtures — log in once in a fixture, hand a pre-authenticated
APIRequestContextto tests, and dispose it on teardown. Never hardcode tokens.
See references/playwright-setup.md for the playwright.config.ts, standalone tests, combined browser+API test, and the authenticated API fixture.
Schema Validation
Validate response shape against a schema rather than spot-checking individual fields with toHaveProperty. Two common approaches:
- Zod 4 — define a schema,
safeParsethe response, and assertresult.success. Logresult.error.issueson failure for a precise diff. Use the Zod 4 native string formats:z.email(),z.uuid(),z.iso.datetime()— the chainedz.string().email()forms are deprecated and slated for removal. - AJV with JSON Schema — when you already have JSON Schema (e.g. from an OpenAPI spec), compile and validate with
ajv+ajv-formats.
Schema-as-contract: have both the API and the tests import the same schema file. If the response shape changes, consumer tests fail immediately. With an OpenAPI spec, auto-generate the schema (orval or openapi-zod-client). For spec-first teams, add Schemathesis as a CI job to fuzz the live API against the spec and catch undocumented shapes and edge-case 500s.
See references/schema-validation.md for the Zod 4, AJV, schema-as-contract, and Schemathesis implementations.
Test Patterns
Cover each endpoint with a happy-path test plus at least one error-path test. The common patterns:
- CRUD lifecycle — a
describe.serialblock that creates, reads, updates, deletes, then verifies the 404. Carries the resource id across steps. - Auth flows — login success, invalid credentials (401), expired token (401), token refresh, and permission boundary (403). Treat auth as its own describe block.
- Error responses — 400 (malformed body), 422 (validation with field details), 429 (rate limit +
retry-after). Don't ship happy-path-only suites. - Response headers — assert
content-type,cache-control, and rate-limit headers directly (not behind a conditional that may never fire). See the pattern below. - Pagination — first-page metadata, out-of-bounds empty page, and rejection of invalid page size.
- File upload/download — multipart upload and
content-dispositionheader verification. - GraphQL — a small
gqlhelper, then query / mutation / invalid-query (errors array) cases, plus an introspection-diff snapshot to catch silently-removed fields. - Webhooks — spin up a throwaway HTTP server, register a webhook, trigger the event, and assert delivery.
See references/test-patterns.md for the full runnable implementations of every pattern above plus performance assertions.
Response Headers
Headers carry the contract: cache directives, rate-limit info, content type, CORS policy. Assert them with response.headers() and index by lowercase name; don't gate the assertion behind an if (rateLimited) that may not fire.
test('GET /api/users sets expected response headers', async ({ request }) => {
const response = await request.get('/api/users');
const headers = response.headers();
expect(headers).toBeDefined();
expect(headers['content-type']).toContain('application/json');
expect(headers['cache-control']).toBeDefined(); // "no-store" | "max-age=60" | ...
});For the rate-limit and retry-after variants, see references/test-patterns.md (Response Header Validation).
Performance Assertions
Response time and payload size are testable assertions — assert that a hot endpoint responds within a budget (e.g. 500ms), that payloads stay under a size ceiling, and that the API survives a burst of concurrent requests without 5xx. See references/test-patterns.md (Performance Assertions section) for the code.
Anti-Patterns
1. Hardcoded auth tokens
Tokens expire, rotate, and differ across environments. Use a login fixture that acquires tokens dynamically.
2. Testing against production
API tests create, modify, and delete data. Run against a dedicated test environment or local instance.
3. Not validating error responses
Happy-path-only suites miss the most common production issues. Test 400, 401, 403, 404, and 500 responses for every endpoint.
4. Asserting headers only conditionally
Headers carry cache directives, rate limit info, content type, and CORS policy. Assert them directly on every relevant response — a check buried inside if (rateLimited) may never run and proves nothing.
5. No cleanup after test data creation
Tests that create resources without deleting them pollute the database. Use afterEach/afterAll hooks or fixture teardown.
6. Treating API tests as unit tests
More from petrkindlmann
Use this skill in a project
Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for petrkindlmann/qa-skills/api-testing, and install it in one click.
