spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills1 file

Writing Tests

Analyze existing code and write comprehensive unit and integration tests for it. Detects the test framework, identifies untested code paths, and generates tests with proper mocking, edge cases, and assertions. Use when the user asks to add tests, improve coverage, or test a specific module.

Specification
Skill ID
spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills/writing-tests
Publisher
spencerpauly
Repository
awesome-cursor-skills
Installs
0
Files
1
Synced
Sep 23, 2026
How to use it

Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.

spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills/writing-testsInstalls these files
  • SKILL.md

What this skill tells the agent

Writing Tests

Use this skill when the user asks to add tests to existing code, improve test coverage, or write tests for a specific file or module.

Steps

  1. Detect the test setup — check what's already configured:
   # Check package.json for test runner
   cat package.json | grep -E "jest|vitest|mocha|playwright|cypress"

Look for config files: vitest.config.ts, jest.config.ts, playwright.config.ts, .mocharc.*. Check for existing test files to understand the project's test patterns and conventions.

  1. If no test runner exists — set one up:
   npm install -D vitest @testing-library/react @testing-library/jest-dom

Add a test script to package.json:

   { "test": "vitest run", "test:watch": "vitest" }
  1. Analyze the target code — read the file(s) to test and identify:
  • Public API: exported functions, classes, components, hooks
  • Code paths: conditionals, error handling, edge cases
  • Dependencies: external services, databases, APIs that need mocking
  • Side effects: file I/O, network calls, DOM mutations
  1. Create the test file — place it next to the source file or in a __tests__/ directory, matching the project's convention:
  • src/utils/format.ts → src/utils/format.test.ts
  • src/components/Button.tsx → src/components/Button.test.tsx
  1. Write tests following this structure:
   import { describe, it, expect, vi } from "vitest";

   describe("functionName", () => {
     // Happy path
     it("returns formatted output for valid input", () => { ... });

     // Edge cases
     it("handles empty string", () => { ... });
     it("handles null/undefined input", () => { ... });

     // Error cases
     it("throws on invalid argument", () => { ... });

     // Boundary conditions
     it("handles maximum length input", () => { ... });
   });
  1. Mock external dependencies — don't make real API calls or database queries in unit tests:
   vi.mock("@/lib/db", () => ({
     query: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1, name: "test" }]),
   }));

For React components, mock hooks that fetch data:

   vi.mock("@/hooks/useUser", () => ({
     useUser: () => ({ user: { name: "Test" }, isLoading: false }),
   }));
  1. Test React components with Testing Library:
   import { render, screen, fireEvent } from "@testing-library/react";

   it("renders the button and handles click", () => {
     const onClick = vi.fn();
     render(<Button onClick={onClick}>Click me</Button>);
     fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole("button", { name: "Click me" }));
     expect(onClick).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
   });
  1. Run the tests and verify they pass:
   npm test

If any fail, fix the test or the code (depending on whether the test expectation or the implementation is wrong).

What to Test

  • Always test: public API, error handling, edge cases (empty, null, zero, negative), state transitions, async behavior
  • Skip testing: private implementation details, third-party library internals, simple getters/setters, type-only code

Notes

  • Match the project's existing test style — if they use test() instead of it(), follow that.
  • Don't test implementation details — test behavior and outputs, not internal method calls.
  • Use descriptive test names that explain the scenario: "returns 0 when cart is empty" not "test1".
  • One assertion concept per test — multiple expect calls are fine if they verify the same behavior.
  • For async code, always await the result or use resolves/rejects matchers.

Use this skill in a project

Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills/writing-tests, and install it in one click.

Use this skill