Microsoft Extensions Dependency Injection
Dependency injection patterns and best practices using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection for .NET applications. Use when configuring DI containers in .NET, choosing between service lifetimes (Singleton, Scoped, Transient), or implementing decorator patterns and service interception.
- Skill ID
- wshaddix/dotnet-skills/microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection
- Publisher
- wshaddix
- Repository
- dotnet-skills
- Installs
- 0
- Files
- 1
- Synced
- Sep 23, 2026
Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.
wshaddix/dotnet-skills/microsoft-extensions-dependency-injectionInstalls these files- SKILL.md
What this skill tells the agent
Dependency Injection Patterns
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Organizing service registrations in ASP.NET Core applications
- Avoiding massive Program.cs/Startup.cs files with hundreds of registrations
- Making service configuration reusable between production and tests
- Designing libraries that integrate with Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection
The Problem
Without organization, Program.cs becomes unmanageable:
// BAD: 200+ lines of unorganized registrations
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IOrderRepository, OrderRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IProductRepository, ProductRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserService, UserService>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IOrderService, OrderService>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IEmailSender, SmtpEmailSender>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IEmailComposer, MjmlEmailComposer>();
builder.Services.AddSingleton<IEmailLinkGenerator, EmailLinkGenerator>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IPaymentProcessor, StripePaymentProcessor>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IInvoiceGenerator, InvoiceGenerator>();
// ... 150 more lines ...Problems:
- Hard to find related registrations
- No clear boundaries between subsystems
- Can't reuse configuration in tests
- Merge conflicts in team settings
- No encapsulation of internal dependencies
The Solution: Extension Method Composition
Group related registrations into extension methods:
// GOOD: Clean, composable Program.cs
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services
.AddUserServices()
.AddOrderServices()
.AddEmailServices()
.AddPaymentServices()
.AddValidators();
var app = builder.Build();Each Add* method encapsulates a cohesive set of registrations.
Extension Method Pattern
Basic Structure
namespace MyApp.Users;
public static class UserServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddUserServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
// Repositories
services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
services.AddScoped<IUserReadStore, UserReadStore>();
services.AddScoped<IUserWriteStore, UserWriteStore>();
// Services
services.AddScoped<IUserService, UserService>();
services.AddScoped<IUserValidationService, UserValidationService>();
// Return for chaining
return services;
}
}With Configuration
namespace MyApp.Email;
public static class EmailServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddEmailServices(
this IServiceCollection services,
string configSectionName = "EmailSettings")
{
// Bind configuration
services.AddOptions<EmailOptions>()
.BindConfiguration(configSectionName)
.ValidateDataAnnotations()
.ValidateOnStart();
// Register services
services.AddSingleton<IMjmlTemplateRenderer, MjmlTemplateRenderer>();
services.AddSingleton<IEmailLinkGenerator, EmailLinkGenerator>();
services.AddScoped<IUserEmailComposer, UserEmailComposer>();
services.AddScoped<IOrderEmailComposer, OrderEmailComposer>();
// SMTP client depends on environment
services.AddScoped<IEmailSender, SmtpEmailSender>();
return services;
}
}With Dependencies on Other Extensions
namespace MyApp.Orders;
public static class OrderServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddOrderServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
// This subsystem depends on email services
// Caller is responsible for calling AddEmailServices() first
// Or we can call it here if it's idempotent
services.AddScoped<IOrderRepository, OrderRepository>();
services.AddScoped<IOrderService, OrderService>();
services.AddScoped<IOrderEmailNotifier, OrderEmailNotifier>();
return services;
}
}File Organization
Place extension methods near the services they register:
src/
MyApp.Api/
Program.cs # Composes all Add* methods
MyApp.Users/
Services/
UserService.cs
IUserService.cs
Repositories/
UserRepository.cs
UserServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddUserServices()
MyApp.Orders/
Services/
OrderService.cs
OrderServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddOrderServices()
MyApp.Email/
Composers/
UserEmailComposer.cs
EmailServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddEmailServices()Convention: {Feature}ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs next to the feature's services.
Naming Conventions
| Pattern | Use For |
|---|---|
Add{Feature}Services() | General feature registration |
Add{Feature}() | Short form when unambiguous |
Configure{Feature}() | When primarily setting options |
Use{Feature}() | Middleware (on IApplicationBuilder) |
// Feature services
services.AddUserServices();
services.AddEmailServices();
services.AddPaymentServices();
// Third-party integrations
services.AddStripePayments();
services.AddSendGridEmail();
// Configuration-heavy
services.ConfigureAuthentication();
services.ConfigureAuthorization();Testing Benefits
The main advantage: reuse production configuration in tests.
WebApplicationFactory
public class ApiTests : IClassFixture<WebApplicationFactory<Program>>
{
private readonly WebApplicationFactory<Program> _factory;
public ApiTests(WebApplicationFactory<Program> factory)
{
_factory = factory.WithWebHostBuilder(builder =>
{
builder.ConfigureServices(services =>
{
// Production services already registered via Add* methods
// Only override what's different for testing
// Replace email sender with test double
services.RemoveAll<IEmailSender>();
services.AddSingleton<IEmailSender, TestEmailSender>();
// Replace external payment processor
services.RemoveAll<IPaymentProcessor>();
services.AddSingleton<IPaymentProcessor, FakePaymentProcessor>();
});
});
}
[Fact]
public async Task CreateOrder_SendsConfirmationEmail()
{
var client = _factory.CreateClient();
var emailSender = _factory.Services.GetRequiredService<IEmailSender>() as TestEmailSender;
await client.PostAsJsonAsync("/api/orders", new CreateOrderRequest(...));
Assert.Single(emailSender!.SentEmails);
}
}Akka.Hosting.TestKit
public class OrderActorSpecs : Akka.Hosting.TestKit.TestKit
{
protected override void ConfigureAkka(AkkaConfigurationBuilder builder, IServiceProvider provider)
{
// Reuse production Akka configuration
builder.AddOrderActors();
}
protected override void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
// Reuse production service configuration
services.AddOrderServices();
// Override only external dependencies
services.RemoveAll<IPaymentProcessor>();
services.AddSingleton<IPaymentProcessor, FakePaymentProcessor>();
}
[Fact]
public async Task OrderActor_ProcessesPayment()
{
var orderActor = ActorRegistry.Get<OrderActor>();
orderActor.Tell(new ProcessOrder(orderId));
ExpectMsg<OrderProcessed>();
}
}Standalone Unit Tests
public class UserServiceTests
{
private readonly ServiceProvider _provider;
public UserServiceTests()
{
var services = new ServiceCollection();
// Reuse production registrations
services.AddUserServices();
// Add test infrastructureMore from wshaddix
Use this skill in a project
Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for wshaddix/dotnet-skills/microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection, and install it in one click.
