- Skill ID
- vitorpamplona/amethyst/kotlin-multiplatform
- Publisher
- vitorpamplona
- Repository
- amethyst
- Installs
- 0
- Files
- 7
- Synced
- Sep 23, 2026
Open any RiverX project, open the Skills panel in the chat, and search for this identifier. The files are fetched from the source repository at install time.
vitorpamplona/amethyst/kotlin-multiplatformInstalls these files- SKILL.md
- references/abstraction-examples.md
- references/expect-actual-catalog.md
- references/source-set-hierarchy.md
- references/target-compatibility.md
- scripts/suggest-kmp-dependency.sh
- scripts/validate-kmp-structure.sh
What this skill tells the agent
Kotlin Multiplatform: Platform Abstraction Decisions
Expert guidance for KMP architecture in Amethyst - deciding what to share vs keep platform-specific.
When to Use This Skill
Making platform abstraction decisions:
- "Should I create expect/actual or keep Android-only?"
- "Can I share this ViewModel logic?"
- "Where does this crypto/JSON/network implementation belong?"
- "This uses Android Context - can it be abstracted?"
- "Is this code in the wrong module?"
- Preparing for iOS/web/wasm targets
- Detecting incorrect placements
Abstraction Decision Tree
Central question: "Should this code be reused across platforms?"
Follow this decision path (< 1 minute):
Q: Is it used by 2+ platforms?
├─ NO → Keep platform-specific
│ Example: Android-only permission handling
│
└─ YES → Continue ↓
Q: Is it pure Kotlin (no platform APIs)?
├─ YES → commonMain
│ Example: Nostr event parsing, business rules
│
└─ NO → Continue ↓
Q: Does it vary by platform or by JVM vs non-JVM?
├─ By platform (Android ≠ iOS ≠ Desktop)
│ → expect/actual
│ Example: Secp256k1Instance (uses different security APIs)
│
├─ By JVM (Android = Desktop ≠ iOS/web)
│ → jvmAndroid
│ Example: Jackson JSON parsing (JVM library)
│
└─ Complex/UI-related
→ Keep platform-specific
Example: Navigation (Activity vs Window too different)
Final check:
Q: Maintenance cost of abstraction < duplication cost?
├─ YES → Proceed with abstraction
└─ NO → Duplicate (simpler)Real Examples from Codebase
Crypto → expect/actual:
// commonMain - expect declaration
expect object Secp256k1Instance {
fun signSchnorr(data: ByteArray, privKey: ByteArray): ByteArray
}
// androidMain - uses Android Keystore
// jvmMain - uses Desktop JVM crypto
// iosMain - uses iOS Security frameworkWhy: Each platform has different security APIs.
JSON parsing → jvmAndroid:
// quartz/build.gradle.kts
val jvmAndroid = create("jvmAndroid") {
api(libs.jackson.module.kotlin)
}Why: Jackson is JVM-only, works on Android + Desktop, not iOS/web.
Navigation → platform-specific:
- Android:
MainActivity(Activity + Compose Navigation) - Desktop:
Window+ sidebar + MenuBar
Why: UI paradigms fundamentally different.
Mental Model: Source Sets as Dependency Graph
Think of source sets as a dependency graph, not folders.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ commonMain = Contract (pure Kotlin) │
│ - Business logic, protocol, data models │
│ - No platform APIs │
└────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
├──────────────────────┬────────────────────
│ │
▼ ▼
┌───────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐
│ jvmAndroid │ │ iosMain │
│ JVM libs shared │ │ iOS common │
│ - Jackson │ │ │
│ - OkHttp │ └────┬─────────────┘
└───┬───────────┬───┘ │
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ├─→ iosArm64Main
┌─────────┐ ┌──────────┐ └─→ iosSimulatorArm64Main
│android │ │jvmMain │
│Main │ │(Desktop) │
└─────────┘ └──────────┘
Future: jsMain, wasmMainKey insight: jvmAndroid is NOT a platform - it's a shared JVM layer.
The jvmAndroid Pattern
Unique to Amethyst. Shares JVM libraries between Android + Desktop.
When to Use jvmAndroid
Use jvmAndroid when:
- ✅ JVM-specific libraries (Jackson, OkHttp, url-detector)
- ✅ Android implementation = Desktop implementation (same JVM)
- ✅ Library doesn't work on iOS/web
Do NOT use jvmAndroid for:
- ❌ Pure Kotlin code (use commonMain)
- ❌ Platform-specific APIs (use androidMain/jvmMain)
- ❌ Code that should work on all platforms
Example from quartz/build.gradle.kts
// Must be defined BEFORE androidMain and jvmMain
val jvmAndroid = create("jvmAndroid") {
dependsOn(commonMain.get())
dependencies {
api(libs.jackson.module.kotlin) // JSON parsing - JVM only
api(libs.url.detector) // URL extraction - JVM only
implementation(libs.okhttp) // HTTP client - JVM only
}
}
// Both depend on jvmAndroid
jvmMain { dependsOn(jvmAndroid) }
androidMain { dependsOn(jvmAndroid) }Why Jackson in jvmAndroid, not commonMain?
- Jackson is JVM-specific library
- Works on Android (runs on JVM)
- Works on Desktop (runs on JVM)
- Does NOT work on iOS (not JVM) or web (not JVM)
Web/wasm consideration: For future web support, consider migrating from Jackson → kotlinx.serialization (see Target-Specific Guidance).
What to Abstract vs Keep Platform-Specific
Quick decision guidelines based on codebase patterns:
Always Abstract
- Crypto (Secp256k1, encryption, signing)
- Core protocol logic (Nostr events, NIPs)
- Why: Needed everywhere, platform security APIs vary
Often Abstract
- I/O operations (file reading, caching)
- Logging (platform logging systems differ)
- Serialization (if using kotlinx.serialization)
- Why: Commonly reused, platform implementations available
Sometimes Abstract
- Business logic: YES - state machines, data processing
- ViewModels: YES - state + business logic shareable (StateFlow/SharedFlow)
- Screen layouts: NO - platform-native (Window vs Activity)
- Why: ViewModels contain platform-agnostic state; Screens render differently per platform
Rarely Abstract
- Complex UI components (composables with heavy platform dependencies)
- Why: Platform paradigms can differ significantly
Never Abstract
- Navigation (Activity vs Window fundamentally different)
- Permissions (Android vs iOS APIs incompatible)
- Platform UX patterns
- Why: Too platform-specific, abstraction creates leaky APIs
Evidence from shared-ui-analysis.md
| Component | Shared? | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| PubKeyFormatter, ZapFormatter | ✅ YES | Pure Kotlin, no platform APIs |
| TimeAgoFormatter | ⚠️ ABSTRACTED | Needs StringProvider for localized strings |
| ViewModels (state + logic) | ✅ YES | StateFlow/SharedFlow platform-agnostic, Compose Multiplatform lifecycle compatible |
| Screen layouts (Scaffold, nav) | ❌ NO | Window vs Activity, sidebar vs bottom nav fundamentally different |
| Image loading (Coil) | ⚠️ ABSTRACTED | Coil 3.x supports KMP, needs expect/actual wrapper |
expect/actual Mechanics
When to use: Code needed by 2+ platforms, varies by platform.
Pattern Categories from Codebase
Objects (singletons):
// 24 expect declarations found, common pattern:
expect object Secp256k1Instance { ... }
expect object Log { ... }
expect object LibSodiumInstance { ... }Classes (instantiable):
expect class AESCBC { ... }
expect class DigestInstance { ... }Functions (utilities):
expect fun platform(): String
expect fun currentTimeSeconds(): LongSee references/expect-actual-catalog.md for complete catalog with rationale.
Target-Specific Guidance
Android, JVM (Desktop), iOS - Current Primary Targets
Status: Mature patterns, stable APIs
Android (androidMain):
- Uses Android framework (Activity, Context, etc.)
- secp256k1-kmp-jni-android (
0.23.0inlibs.versions.toml) for crypto - AndroidX libraries
Desktop JVM (jvmMain):
- Uses Compose Desktop (Window, MenuBar, etc.)
- secp256k1-kmp-jni-jvm (same
0.23.0line) for crypto - Pure JVM libraries
iOS (iosMain):
- Mature target — actively built and tested
- Architecture targets: iosArm64, iosSimulatorArm64, iosX64 (plus macosArm64 for host tooling)
- Platform APIs via platform.posix, Security framework
Web, wasm - Future Targets
Status: Not yet implemented, consider for future-proofing
Constraints to know:
- ❌ No platform.posix (file I/O different)
More from vitorpamplona
Use this skill in a project
Open any RiverX project, search the Skills panel for vitorpamplona/amethyst/kotlin-multiplatform, and install it in one click.
